Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/21508
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBallantine, James A.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-23T06:08:40Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-23T06:08:40Z-
dc.date.issued1998-
dc.identifier.citationKılıç, N. ve Ballantine, J. A. (1998). "Comparison of various adsorbents for long-term diffusive sampling of volatile organic compounds". Analyst, 123(9), 1795-1797.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-2654-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1039/a801339j-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubs.rsc.org/En/content/articlelanding/1998/an/a801339j-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/21508-
dc.description.abstractThe relative performances of diffusive samplers packed with Tenax TA, Chromosorb 106 and Carbotrap for the long-term diffusive sampling of several typical volatile organic compounds were compared. In order to measure the magnitudes of the decreases in mass uptakes in a real long-term diffusive sampling situation, the results for 7 and 14 d sampling periods were compared with the sum of consecutive 1 d diffusive sampling results, performed in parallel for the same period of time. The results of this study gives information about the magnitudes of the decreases in mass uptakes in a real sampling situation and show the limitations of the adsorbents tested for the sampling of volatile organic compounds from different classes such as acetone and dichloromethane as compounds with a functional group, toluene as an example of aromatic compounds and pentane, hexane, nonane decane and undecane as examples of straight chain hydrocarbons (C-5-C-11) It was shown that the data obtained from long-term diffusive sampling are subject to significant error, particularly for low boiling compounds. Chromosorb 106 could be the adsorbent of choice fbr this sampling situation, as it gives the highest percentage of masses (ng) collected for longer exposure periods relative to the sum of the masses (ng) collected over each exposure period among the other adsorbents tested.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoyal Soc Chemistryen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectChemistryen_US
dc.titleComparison of various adsorbents for long-term diffusive sampling of volatile organic compoundsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000075929300004tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0031693409tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi/Kimya Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage1795tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage1797tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume123tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue9tr_TR
dc.relation.journalAnalysten_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorKılıç, Naciye-
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışıtr_TR
dc.subject.wosChemistry, analyticalen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.wos.quartileQ1en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid56240238700tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusSamplers; Volatile Organic Compounds; Nitrogen Dioxideen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAliphatic hydrocarbonen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAromatic compounden_US
dc.subject.emtreeDecaneen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDichloromethaneen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHexaneen_US
dc.subject.emtreePentaneen_US
dc.subject.emtreeVolatile organic compounden_US
dc.subject.emtreeAbsorptionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCalibrationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeGas diffusionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSamplingen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.