Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/21952
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-14T12:50:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-14T12:50:39Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2003-08 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Uysal, A.Ç. vd. (2003). “Comparison of the biological activities of high-density porous polyethylene implants and oxidized regenerated cellulose-wrapped diced cartilage grafts”. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 112(2), 540-546. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0032-1052 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000070967.06488.63 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Citation/2003/08000/Comparison_of_the_Biological_Activities_of.21.aspx | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11452/21952 | - |
dc.description | Bu çalışma, 27-30 Eylül 2001 tarihleri arasında İstanbul'da düzenlenen 23. Ulusal Türk Plastik Cerrahi Derneği Kongresinde sözlü bildiri olarak sunulmuştur. | tr_TR |
dc.description.abstract | The use of alloplastic materials in plastic surgery has become more extensive with advancement of autogenoustissue reconstruction techniques for the repair of defects, tissue augmentation, and the stabilization of bones. An ideal alloplastic material should be nonallergenic, noncarcinogenic, sterilizable, and easy to shape and should not cause rejection. Alloplastic material used for tissue augmentation should have a low rate of resorption and distortion. High-density porous polyethylene implants (Medpor) have been used widely and successfully for tissue augmentation. The Turkish Delight is a material composed of diced cartilage grafts wrapped in oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel). Its indications are similar to those of the Medpor implant, and an additional donor site is usually not needed. Both materials are used in the same anatomical locations, especially for augmentation. Therefore, the authors evaluated the long-term stability of and suitable anatomical sites for these materials. Medpor implants or Turkish Delights were placed subperiosteally or subfascially in 10 young rabbits, and the resultant changes were evaluated 16 weeks after the operation by macroscopy and histopathology. Changes in projections were measured with an ocular micrometer. Medpor implants were neither resorbed nor distorted when placed subperiosteally or subfascially, and were highly stabilized by the surrounding tissues. Turkish Delight also enabled tissue augmentation, but had a significantly higher rate of resorption compared with the Medpor implant and was loosely bound to the surrounding tissue. The Turkish Delight was less resorbed and better fixed to adjacent tissues when placed subperiosteally than when placed subfascially. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Turkish Soc Plast Surg | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Surgery | en_US |
dc.subject | Reconstruction | en_US |
dc.subject | Medpor | en_US |
dc.subject | Augmentation | en_US |
dc.subject | Biomaterials | en_US |
dc.subject | Contour | en_US |
dc.subject | Bone | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Animals | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Biocompatible materials | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cartilage | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cellulose, oxidized | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Ear cartilages | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Implants, experimental | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Muscle, skeletal | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Polyethylenes | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Rabbits | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Reconstructive surgical procedures | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Skull | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of the biological activities of high-density porous polyethylene implants and oxidized regenerated cellulose-wrapped diced cartilage grafts | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.type | Proceedings Paper | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000184532700021 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-0042631383 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi. | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | 540 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.endpage | 546 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 112 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.journal | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery | en_US |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Uysal, Afşin Ç. | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Özbek, Serhat | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Özcan, Mesut | - |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAH-5441-2021 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 12900612 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.wos | Surgery | en_US |
dc.indexed.wos | SCIE | en_US |
dc.indexed.wos | CPCIS | en_US |
dc.indexed.scopus | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indexed.pubmed | Pubmed | en_US |
dc.wos.quartile | Q1 | en_US |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 7005410156 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 7005245657 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 7102067678 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.scopus | Nose Reconstruction; Costal Cartilage; Nasal Bone | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Oxidized regenerated cellulose | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Polyethylene | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Allograft | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Cartilage graft | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Density | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Device | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug activity | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Fascia | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Graft rejection | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Histopathology | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Human | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Implant | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Joint stability | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Ocular micrometer | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Orthopedic surgery | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Osteolysis | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Plastic surgery | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Porosity | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Priority journal | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Prosthesis fixation | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Prosthesis material | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Rabbit | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Retroperitoneum | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Skin defect | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Surgical technique | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Tissue reaction | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.