Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/22727
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAkarsu, Cengiz-
dc.contributor.authorSalkaya, Muhsin-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-19T06:24:11Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-19T06:24:11Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationYazıcı, B. vd. (2006). ''Silicone intubation with the Ritleng method in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction''. Journal of AAPOS, 10(4), 328-332.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1091-8531-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.02.011-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1091853106002679-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/22727-
dc.descriptionBu çalışma, 23 Ekim 2004'de New Orleans, Los Angeles[ABD]'de düzenlenen 35. Annual Meeting of the American-Society-of-Ophthalmic-Plastic-and-Reconstructive-Surgery'de sözlü bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.tr_TR
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the technical properties and clinical efficacy of bicanalicular silicone intubation with the Ritleng method in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Methods. The Ritleng method was used for lacrimal intubation in 50 eyes of 42 consecutive patients (mean age, 37.3 months). All procedures were done by or under the supervision of one surgeon. The hollow Ritleng probe was inserted via the canaliculus into the inferior meatus. The polypropylene (Prolene) thread-guide, attached to the silicone tube, was advanced through the probe. Either the Prolene emerged from the nose spontaneously or it was retrieved using a hook without visualization. The tube ends were sutured to the nasal wall. Tube removal was planned for 3 months postoperatively. Resolution of signs and symptoms of lacrimal obstruction was assessed. The mean follow-up time was 18.1 months (range, 3 to 48 months). Results. The silicone tube was placed successfully in all eyes except 1 (98%). The mean procedure time was 26 minutes for each eye (range, 15 to 45 minutes). Both Prolene guides spontaneously emerged from the nose in only 8 eyes (16%). In the others, one or both Prolene guides were retrieved with a hook. Inadvertent tube dislodgement occurred in 21% of the eyes and required early tube removal. Success, ie, relief of signs and symptoms, was achieved in 86% of eyes. Conclusions:The Ritleng method of intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction yields a high rate of success. Contrary to previous reports, our experience suggests that the surgeon must be prepared to retrieve the Prolene guide from the nose.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAmer Soc Ophthalm Plast & Reconstruct Surgen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMosby-Elsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOphthalmologyen_US
dc.subjectPediatricsen_US
dc.subjectLacrimal systemen_US
dc.subject.meshChilden_US
dc.subject.meshPreschoolen_US
dc.subject.meshSilicone elastomersen_US
dc.subject.meshPrognosisen_US
dc.subject.meshNasolacrimal ducten_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshLacrimal duct obstructionen_US
dc.subject.meshIntubationen_US
dc.subject.meshInfanten_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.titleSilicone intubation with the Ritleng method in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeProceedings Paperen_US
dc.identifier.wos000240459300009tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-33747794609tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8889-1933tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage328tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage332tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume10tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue4tr_TR
dc.relation.journalJournal of AAPOSen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorYazıcı, Bülent-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAA-5384-2020tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içitr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed16935232tr_TR
dc.subject.wosPediatricsen_US
dc.subject.wosOphthalmologyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.wosCPCISen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ4en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid7005398015tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusLacrimal Duct; Lacerations; Dacryocystitisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSiliconeen_US
dc.subject.emtreePolypropyleneen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTube removalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTherapy effecten_US
dc.subject.emtreeSuturing methoden_US
dc.subject.emtreeSurgical techniqueen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSurgical patienten_US
dc.subject.emtreeSurgical equipmenten_US
dc.subject.emtreeSurgeonen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRitleng methoden_US
dc.subject.emtreePriority journalen_US
dc.subject.emtreePostoperative complicationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeOperation durationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMedical assessmenten_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLacrimal duct occlusionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLacrimal ducten_US
dc.subject.emtreeIntubationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFollow upen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeEvaluationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeClinical articleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeChilden_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.