Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/22801
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMouazen, Abdul Mounem-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T05:55:40Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-26T05:55:40Z-
dc.date.issued2012-01-
dc.identifier.citationTekin, Y. vd. (2012). "Effect of moisture content on prediction of organic carbon and pH using visible and near-infrared spectroscopy". Soil Science Society of America Journal, 76(1), 188-198.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0361-5995-
dc.identifier.issn1435-0661-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2011.0021-
dc.identifier.urihttps://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2136/sssaj2011.0021-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/22801-
dc.description.abstractThis study was undertaken to investigate the effect of moisture content (MC) on the prediction accuracy of soil organic C (SOC) and pH of soils collected from Turkey and the United Kingdom using a fiber-type visible and near infrared (Vis-NIR) spectrophotometer. The diffuse reflectance spectra of 270 soil samples were measured under six gravimetric MC levels of 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25%. Partial least squares (PLS) regression analyses with full cross-validation were performed to establish models for SOC and pH. Before PLS analysis, the entire spectra were randomly split three times into calibration (80%) and validation (20%) sets. Results showed that the prediction performance of SOC in the validation set was successful, with root mean square errors of prediction (RMSEPs) of 1.26 to 1.55% and residual prediction deviations (RPDs) of 2.29 to 2.83, and rather poor for pH, with RMSEPs of 0.65 to 0.85 and RPDs of 1.29 to 1.65. The best accuracy achieved for SOC was for dry soil samples (RMSEP = 1.26%, RPD = 2.83), whereas the worst accuracy was for wet soil samples with 5% MC (RMSEP = 1.55%, RPD = 2.29). The best result for pH was obtained for dry samples (RMSEP = 0.70%, RPD = 1.65), although this accuracy was comparable to that of the 10% MC soil samples (RMSEP = 0.65%, RPD = 1.60). The ANOVA supported the conclusion that there was a significant effect of MC on prediction accuracy, although this effect was larger for SOC (P < 0.0000) than pH (P < 0.05).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAgricultureen_US
dc.subjectDiffuse-reflectance spectroscopyen_US
dc.subjectSoil propertiesen_US
dc.subjectLeast-squaresen_US
dc.subjectUltra-violeten_US
dc.subjectClayen_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectMatteren_US
dc.subjectTurkeyen_US
dc.subjectUnited kingdomen_US
dc.subjectCarbon fibersen_US
dc.subjectForecastingen_US
dc.subjectInfrared devicesen_US
dc.subjectMean square erroren_US
dc.subjectMoistureen_US
dc.subjectMoisture determinationen_US
dc.subjectOrganic carbonen_US
dc.subjectRegression analysisen_US
dc.subjectSoil surveysen_US
dc.subjectSoilsen_US
dc.subjectCross validationen_US
dc.subjectDiffuse reflectance spectrumen_US
dc.subjectDry soilen_US
dc.subjectMoisture contentsen_US
dc.subjectPartial least-squares regressionen_US
dc.subjectPLS analysisen_US
dc.subjectPrediction accuracyen_US
dc.subjectPrediction performanceen_US
dc.subjectRoot mean square errorsen_US
dc.subjectSoil organic Cen_US
dc.subjectSoil sampleen_US
dc.subjectVisible and near infrareden_US
dc.subjectVisible and near-infrared spectroscopyen_US
dc.subjectWet soilen_US
dc.subjectAccuracy assessmenten_US
dc.subjectGravimetryen_US
dc.subjectInfrared spectroscopyen_US
dc.subjectModel validationen_US
dc.subjectMoisture contenten_US
dc.subjectOrganic carbonen_US
dc.subjectOrganic soilen_US
dc.subjectpHen_US
dc.subjectRegression analysisen_US
dc.subjectSoil organic matteren_US
dc.subjectSpectral reflectanceen_US
dc.subjectSpectrophotometryen_US
dc.subjectpH effectsen_US
dc.titleEffect of moisture content on prediction of organic carbon and pH using visible and near-infrared spectroscopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000299220200020tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84855416632tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Teknik Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi.tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage188tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage198tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume76tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue1tr_TR
dc.relation.journalSoil Science Society of America Journalen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorTekin, Yücel-
dc.contributor.buuauthorTümsavaş, Zeynal-
dc.contributor.researcheridJ-3560-2012tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışıtr_TR
dc.subject.wosSoil scienceen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.wos.quartileQ2en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid15064756600tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6507710594tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusSoil Color; Soil Organic Matter; Hyperspectralen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.