Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/22871
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrasiliense, Leonardo-
dc.contributor.authorLázaro, Bruno C.R.-
dc.contributor.authorReyes, Phillip M.-
dc.contributor.authorTheodore, Nicholas-
dc.contributor.authorCrawford, Neil-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-30T07:34:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-30T07:34:45Z-
dc.date.issued2011-11-15-
dc.identifier.citationBrasiliense, LBC. vd. (2011). ''Biomechanical contribution of the rib cage to thoracic stability''. Spine, 36(26), E1686-E1693.tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn0362-2436-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318219ce84-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22138782/-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/22871-
dc.description.abstractStudy Design. In vitro assessment of rib cage biomechanics in the region of true ribs with the ribs intact then sequentially resected in 5 steps. Objective. To determine the contribution of the rib cage to thoracic spine stability and kinematics. Summary of Background Data. Previous in vitro studies of rib cage biomechanics have used animal spines or human cadaveric spines with ribs left unsecured, limiting the ability of the ribs to contribute to stability. Methods. Eight upper thoracic specimens that included 4 ribs and sternum were tested in special fixtures that disallowed relative movement of the distal ribs and their vertebrae. While applying 7.5 Nm pure moments in 3 planes, angular motion at the middle motion segment was studied in intact specimens and then (1) after splitting the sternum, (2) after removing the sternum, (3) after removing 50% of ribs, (4) after removing 75% of ribs, and (5) after disarticulating and completely removing ribs. Results. During flexion/extension, the sternum and anterior rib cage most contributed to stability. During lateral bending, the posterior rib cage most contributed to stability. During axial rotation, stability was directly related to the proportion of ribs remaining intact. On average, intact ribs accounted for 78% of thoracic stability. An intact rib cage shifted the axis of rotation unpredictably, but its position remained consistent after partial resection of the ribs. During lateral bending, coupled axial rotation was mild and unaffected by ribs. Conclusion. Because of testing methodology, the rib cage accounted for a greater percentage of thoracic stability than previously estimated. Different rib cage structures resisted motion in different loading planes.tr_TR
dc.language.isoentr_TR
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinstr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccesstr_TR
dc.subjectNeurosciences & neurologytr_TR
dc.subjectOrthopedicstr_TR
dc.subjectThoracic spinetr_TR
dc.subjectRib cagetr_TR
dc.subjectBiomechanicstr_TR
dc.subjectKinematicstr_TR
dc.subjectSternal fracturestr_TR
dc.subjectSpinal-injurytr_TR
dc.subject4th columntr_TR
dc.subjectModeltr_TR
dc.subjectFixationtr_TR
dc.subjectJointtr_TR
dc.subject.meshAdulttr_TR
dc.subject.meshAgedtr_TR
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and overtr_TR
dc.subject.meshBiomechanicstr_TR
dc.subject.meshCadavertr_TR
dc.subject.meshFemaletr_TR
dc.subject.meshHumanstr_TR
dc.subject.meshMaletr_TR
dc.subject.meshMiddle agedtr_TR
dc.subject.meshMovementtr_TR
dc.subject.meshRange of motion, articulartr_TR
dc.subject.meshRibstr_TR
dc.subject.meshRotationtr_TR
dc.subject.meshSternumtr_TR
dc.subject.meshThoracic vertebraetr_TR
dc.subject.meshWeight-bearingtr_TR
dc.titleBiomechanical contribution of the rib cage to thoracic stabilitytr_TR
dc.typeArticletr_TR
dc.identifier.wos000298147100004tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-83255192339tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Beyin ve Sinir Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpageE1686tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpageE1693tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume36tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue26tr_TR
dc.relation.journalSpinetr_TR
dc.contributor.buuauthorDoǧan, Şeref-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAI-6531-2021tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationSanayitr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed22138782tr_TR
dc.subject.wosClinical neurologytr_TR
dc.subject.wosOrthopedicstr_TR
dc.indexed.wosSCIEtr_TR
dc.indexed.scopusScopustr_TR
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmedtr_TR
dc.wos.quartileQ2 (Orthopedics)tr_TR
dc.wos.quartileQ3 (Clinical neurology)tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7102693077tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusAnnulus Fibrosus; Intervertebral Disc; Lumbar Spinetr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeAdulttr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeAgedtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeArticletr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeBiomechanicstr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeBone bowingtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeCadavertr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeClinical articletr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeFemaletr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeHumantr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeIn vitro studytr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeKinematicstr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeMaletr_TR
dc.subject.emtreePriority journaltr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeRange of motiontr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeRotationtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeSternumtr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeThoracic spinetr_TR
dc.subject.emtreeVertebratr_TR
Appears in Collections:Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.