Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/22975
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorErtan, Turan-
dc.contributor.authorErtan, Sibel-
dc.contributor.authorCankurtaran, Eylem Şahin-
dc.contributor.authorAki, Özlem Erden-
dc.contributor.authorUludüz, Derya-
dc.contributor.authorİnce, Birsen-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-03T07:10:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-03T07:10:13Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.citationSivrioğlu, E. Y. vd. (2009). "Reliability and validity of the geriatric depression scale in detection of poststroke minor depression". Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 31(8), 999-1006.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1380-3395-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/13803390902776878-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13803390902776878-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/22975-
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of the 30-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) as a screening tool for minor depression in poststroke patients. Method: Literate patients older than 18 years of age, diagnosed to have stroke, were eligible for the study. Standardized Mini Mental Status Examination (S-MMSE) and GDS were applied to all patients. The GDS was readministered 7 days later for retest reliability. Results: A total of 85 participants-49 nondepressed and 36 with minor depression-were eligible for the study. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was .89 in internal consistency analysis. The GDS scores were significantly higher (p < .001) in the depressed participants reflecting a high discriminant validity. The highest sum of sensitivity and specificity values of 1.44 (sensitivity = .69, specificity = .75) and 1.45 (sensitivity = .66, specificity = .79) were obtained for cutoff scores of 10/11 and 11/12, respectively. The area under receiver operating characteristics curve was .82. The test-retest reliability analysis revealed a high Pearson correlation coefficient (r = .75). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that the 30-item GDS has high discriminant validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability and reasonably useful cutoff scores; thus it can be used as a screening tool for minor depression in the poststroke population.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDepressionen_US
dc.subjectGeriatric depression scaleen_US
dc.subjectMinor depressionen_US
dc.subjectPoststroke depressionen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectValidityen_US
dc.subjectCerebrovascular-diseaseen_US
dc.subjectPsychometric evaluationen_US
dc.subjectStroke patientsen_US
dc.subjectRisk-factorsen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectRecoveryen_US
dc.subjectSymptomsen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectNeurosciences & neurologyen_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshDepressionen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshGeriatric assessmenten_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.meshPsychiatric status rating scalesen_US
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of resultsen_US
dc.subject.meshROC curveen_US
dc.subject.meshStrokeen_US
dc.titleReliability and validity of the geriatric depression scale in detection of poststroke minor depressionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000271830800009tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-74949110150tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage999tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage1006tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume31tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue8tr_TR
dc.relation.journalJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychologyen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorSivrioğlu, Enver Yusuf-
dc.contributor.buuauthorSivrioğlu, Konçuy-
dc.contributor.buuauthorKirli, Selçuk-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8211-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8193-2021tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içitr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed19343606tr_TR
dc.subject.wosPsychology, clinicalen_US
dc.subject.wosClinical neurologyen_US
dc.subject.wosPsychologyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.wosSSCIen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ3en_US
dc.wos.quartileQ2 (Psychology, clinical)en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid14062563200tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56245687600tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid14019745700tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusAphasia; Strokes; Survivorsen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAgeden_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeClinical trialen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDepressionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeGeriatric assessmenten_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.emtreeMulticenter studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreePsychological rating scaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeReceiver operating characteristicen_US
dc.subject.emtreeReproducibilityen_US
dc.subject.emtreeStrokeen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.