Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/22999
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-06T07:46:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-06T07:46:01Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006-09-30 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Yazıcıoğlu, B. vd. (2006). ''A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of reboxetine and sertraline versus venlafaxine in major depressive disorder: A randomized, open-labeled clinical trial''. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 30(7), 1271-1276. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0278-5846 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1878-4216 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.04.018 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278584606001795 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11452/22999 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of reboxetine and sertraline to venlafaxine XR (extended release) in major depressive disorder (MDD). The study consisted of 40 patients with MDD, aged 18-65 years. Patients were evaluated six times during a 10-week period. Treatment was started as venlafaxine XR 75 mg/day once a day (od) or reboxetine 4 mg/day twice a day (bid)+ sertraline 50 mg/day od. In the second week, venlafaxine XR was increased to 150 mg/day od and reboxetine 8 mg/day bid while sertraline was kept at the same dose. The Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness and Clinical Global Impression s-Global Improvement Scale were applied on each visit. Beginning from the second visit, both groups showed significant declines in each scale. There were no significant differences between treatment response rates. Remission rates defined as HDRS <= 10 were significantly higher in the venlafaxine XR group at visit 4 only. However, when remission was accepted as HDRS <= 7, no significant difference was observed. Side effect frequency was similar between the treatment groups. We may suggest that the reboxetine+ sertraline combination is not superior to venlafaxine treatment. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Pergamon-Elsevier Science | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Neurosciences & neurology | en_US |
dc.subject | Pharmacology & pharmacy | en_US |
dc.subject | Psychiatry | en_US |
dc.subject | Depression | en_US |
dc.subject | Reboxetine | en_US |
dc.subject | Sertraline | en_US |
dc.subject | Venlafaxine | en_US |
dc.subject | Remission | en_US |
dc.subject | Fluoxetine | en_US |
dc.subject | Citalopram | en_US |
dc.subject | Augmentation | en_US |
dc.subject | Nonresponders | en_US |
dc.subject | Paroxetine | en_US |
dc.subject | Resistant | en_US |
dc.subject | Bupropion sr | en_US |
dc.subject | Double-blind | en_US |
dc.subject | Serotonin reuptake inhibitors | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Time factors | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Sertraline | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Serotonin uptake inhibitors | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Morpholines | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Drug interactions | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adolescent | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Drug evaluation | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adrenergic uptake inhibitors | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Depressive disorder, major | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Cyclohexanols | en_US |
dc.title | A comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of reboxetine and sertraline versus venlafaxine in major depressive disorder: A randomized, open-labeled clinical trial | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000240280000015 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-33747067089 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Psikiyatri Anabilim Dalı. | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Biyoistatistik Anabilim Dalı. | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1271 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.endpage | 1276 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 30 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.journal | Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry | en_US |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Yazıcıoğlu, Bengi | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Akkaya, Cengiz | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Sarandol, Aslı | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Akgöz, Semra | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Eker, Saygın | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Kirli, Selçuk | - |
dc.contributor.researcherid | Q-9477-2019 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 16820257 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.wos | Clinical neurology | en_US |
dc.subject.wos | Neurosciences | en_US |
dc.subject.wos | Pharmacology & pharmacy | en_US |
dc.subject.wos | Psychiatry | en_US |
dc.indexed.wos | SCIE | en_US |
dc.indexed.scopus | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indexed.pubmed | Pubmed | en_US |
dc.wos.quartile | Q2 | en_US |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 25226441700 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 14061855100 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 14061863400 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 36341064200 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 14019745700 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.scopus | Morpholines; Reboxetine; Amino Alcohols | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Venlafaxine | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Sertraline | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Reboxetine | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Xerostomia | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Treatment outcome | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Statistical analysis | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Side effect | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Remission | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Randomized controlled trial | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Nausea | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Montgomery asberg depression rating scale | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Major depression | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Human | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Hamilton scale | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Follow up | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Flushing | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug tolerability | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug induced headache | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug efficacy | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Controlled study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Controlled clinical trial | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Constipation | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Clinical trial | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Clinical global impression scale | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Clinical article | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Anorgasmia | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Agitation | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Adult | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.