Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/23623
Title: Comparison of peritonsillar levobupivacaine and bupivacaine infiltration for post-tonsillectomy pain relief in children: Placebo-controlled clinical study
Authors: Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Kulak Burun Boğaz Anabilim Dalı.
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Anesteziyoloji Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0002-9698-0546
Kasapoǧlu, Fikret
Kaya, Fatma Nur
Tüzemen, Gökhan
Özmen, Ömer Afşin
Kaya, Atila
Onart, Selçuk
AAI-8213-2021
AAI-3877-2021
A-1452-2019
56254721200
7003619647
30267939800
55407733900
36922282800
7801637934
Keywords: Otorhinolaryngology
Pediatrics
Children
Tonsillectomy
Postoperative pain
Levobupivacaine
Bupivacaine
Infiltration anesthesia
Postoperative tonsillar infiltration
Topical lidocaine
Local-anesthetics
Ropivacaine
Morbidity
Adrenaline
Reduction
Issue Date: Mar-2011
Publisher: Elsevier Ireland
Citation: Fikret, K. vd. (2011). ''Comparison of peritonsillar levobupivacaine and bupivacaine infiltration for post-tonsillectomy pain relief in children: Placebo-controlled clinical study''. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 75(3), 322-326.
Abstract: Objectives: To compare the effects of preincisional peritonsillar infiltration of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine on post-tonsillectomy pain in children. Methods: Sixty children undergoing elective tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy were randomly allocated into three groups before tonsillectomy: peritonsillar infiltrations with 0.25% levobupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (group levobupivacaine, n = 20), 0.25% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (group bupivacaine, n = 20), and normal saline (group saline, n = 20) were applied. Pain was evaluated by using a modified Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (mCHEOPS). Choice of additional analgesic was acetaminophen for all patients. Results: mCHEOPS values at 0th (immediately) and 30th minute after arrival the PACU were lower in both the local anesthetics groups than the saline group (p < 0.001, p < 0.01 for the group levobupivacaine; p < 0.001. p < 0.05 for the group bupivacaine, respectively). In addition, mCHEOPS values at 1st hour in the ward was lower in the group bupivacaine when compared to the group saline (p < 0.05). Analgesic requirements and the time to first analgesia required, were also significantly different between the local anesthetic and saline groups (p < 0.05 for both local anesthetics groups). Time to first mobilization was shorter in both local anesthetic groups when compared to the saline group (p < 0.05 for both local anesthetic groups). Conclusion: Preincisional peritonsillar infiltration with levobupivacaine or bupivacaine before tonsillectomy, are effective than saline, in reducing early post-tonsillectomy pain, where as bupivacaine had slightly longer effect. Compared to saline, with both anesthetic infiltrations, lesser medication for analgesia is required. The clinical trial registration number (Research Ethics Committee of Medical Faculty, Uludag University): 2008-4/36, 19 February 2008.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.11.015
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165587610005380
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/23623
ISSN: 0165-5876
1872-8464
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.