Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/23873
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-05T12:50:24Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-05T12:50:24Z-
dc.date.issued2011-09-
dc.identifier.citationÖztürk, E. vd. (2011). ''The beneficial effects of preperitoneal catheter analgesia following colon and rectal resections: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study''. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 15(3), 331-336.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1123-6337-
dc.identifier.issn1128-045X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0720-6-
dc.identifier.urihttps://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21769617/-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/23873-
dc.descriptionBu çalışma, 09-13 Eylül 2009 tarihleri arasında Salzburg[Avusturya]’da düzenlenen 28. Annual European-Society-of-Regional-Anaesthesia Congress’da bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.tr_TR
dc.description.abstractPreperitoneal catheter analgesia following abdominal surgery has attracted interest in the last decade. We conducted this study to evaluate the benefits of preperitoneal catheter analgesia in managing pain after abdominal colon and rectal resections. A total of 50 patients undergoing colon and rectal resections for benign and malignant diseases received analgesic medicines via an epidural catheter placed just prior to surgery and a preperitoneal catheter placed at the end of the surgical procedure. Patients were instructed to use the epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device freely and were randomized into two groups after obtaining the approval of the Institutional Review Board: Group A received 10 ml of levobupivacaine twice a day postoperatively via preperitoneal catheter and group B received only 10 ml of saline. Demographics, surgical characteristics, pain scores recorded four days following surgery, analgesic volume used from the epidural PCA, clinical outcomes (length of stay, time to first bowel movement, time to first passage of gas or stool, time to first oral intake) and respiratory function test results (preoperative vs. postoperative) were compared. There were no significant differences in demographics or surgical characteristics between both groups. Pain scores were similar. Clinical outcomes and respiratory functions were comparable. The use of analgesic volume via epidural catheter was significantly lower in group A than in group B (P = 0.032). Preperitoneal catheter analgesia significantly decreased the need for epidural drug consumption and proved to be a beneficial adjunct for postoperative pain management of patients who underwent colon and rectal resections.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Soc Reg Anaesthesiaen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectGastroenterology & hepatologyen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectPreperitonealen_US
dc.subjectCatheteren_US
dc.subjectAnalgesiaen_US
dc.subjectLocal anestheticen_US
dc.subjectContinuous wound infusionen_US
dc.subjectPostoperative painen_US
dc.subjectColorectal surgeryen_US
dc.subjectBupivacaineen_US
dc.subjectPerfusionen_US
dc.subjectReliefen_US
dc.subjectHysterectomyen_US
dc.subjectRecoveryen_US
dc.subjectEfficacyen_US
dc.subjectSystemen_US
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshAnalgesia, epiduralen_US
dc.subject.meshAnalgesia, patient-controlleden_US
dc.subject.meshAnalgesics, opioiden_US
dc.subject.meshAnesthesia, localen_US
dc.subject.meshAnesthetics, localen_US
dc.subject.meshBupivacaineen_US
dc.subject.meshColorectal surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshDouble-blind methoden_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshFentanylen_US
dc.subject.meshForced expiratory volumeen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshInstillation, drugen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.meshOxygenen_US
dc.subject.meshPain measurementen_US
dc.subject.meshPain, postoperativeen_US
dc.subject.meshPeritoneumen_US
dc.subject.meshProspective studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshVital capacityen_US
dc.subject.meshYoung adulten_US
dc.titleThe beneficial effects of preperitoneal catheter analgesia following colon and rectal resections: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeProceedings Paperen_US
dc.identifier.wos000293923500014tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80052459393tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararasıtr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Akciğer Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9541-5035tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3604-8826tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage331tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage336tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume15tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue3tr_TR
dc.relation.journalTechniques in Coloproctologyen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖztürk, Ersin-
dc.contributor.buuauthorYılmazlar, Aysun-
dc.contributor.buuauthorCoşkun, Funda-
dc.contributor.buuauthorIşık, Özgen-
dc.contributor.buuauthorYılmazlar, Tuncay-
dc.contributor.researcheridP-5779-2019tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAD-1271-2019tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed21769617tr_TR
dc.subject.wosGastroenterology & hepatologyen_US
dc.subject.wosSurgeryen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.wosCPCISen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ4 (Gastroenterology & hepatology)en_US
dc.wos.quartileQ3 (Surgery)en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid35070171400tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid55899579900tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid21734137500tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid36600543700tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6701800362tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusRopivacaine; Postoperative Pain; Local Anesthetic Agenten_US
dc.subject.emtreeBupivacaineen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFentanylen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLevobupivacaineen_US
dc.subject.emtreePlaceboen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSodium chlorideen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAbsence of side effectsen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeAnalgesiaen_US
dc.subject.emtreeClinical articleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeColon resectionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeColorectal canceren_US
dc.subject.emtreeColorectal diseaseen_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDefecationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDemographyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDouble blind procedureen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDrug administration routeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDiseaseen_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDefecationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDemographyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDouble blind procedureen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDrug administration routeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeEpidural anesthesiaen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFlatulenceen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLength of stayen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLung function testen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreePain assessmenten_US
dc.subject.emtreePatient controlled analgesiaen_US
dc.subject.emtreePostoperative painen_US
dc.subject.emtreePreoperative perioden_US
dc.subject.emtreePreperioteneal drug administrationen_US
dc.subject.emtreepreperitoneal catheter analgesiaen_US
dc.subject.emtreeProspective studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRectum resectionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeReviewen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeVisual analog scaleen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.