Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/23955
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-10T07:50:32Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-10T07:50:32Z-
dc.date.issued2002-12-
dc.identifier.citationAytekin, N. T. vd. (2002). "The comparison of reproductive health data in a rural district in Turkey (1981-2001)". European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 7(4), 234-237.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1362-5187-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/ejc.7.4.234.237-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/ejc.7.4.234.237-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/23955-
dc.description.abstractObjectives The main objective was to compare new reproductive and family planning data with data from the 1981 survey. Methods All 15-49-year-old married women living in seven villages of Gemlik were interviewed and the data were compared with the 1981 data of the same villages. Results In 1981, 66.8% used a family planning method, 6.8% used an intrauterine device, 10.2% used oral contraceptives and 10.0% used condoms. In 2001, these values were 93.0%, 36.5%, 6.0% and 14.8%, respectively. In 1981, 51.5% and in 2001 35.5% used coitus interruptus. Conclusion In 20 years, users of both current family planning methods and modern methods have increased; users of traditional methods have decreased Results In 1981, 66.8% used a family planning method, 6.8% used an intrauterine device, 10.2% used oral contraceptives and 10.0% used condoms. In 2001, these values were 93.0%, 36.5%, 6.0% and 14.8%, respectively. In 1981, 51.5% and in 2001 35.5% used coitus interruptus. Conclusion In 20 years, users of both current family planning methods and modern methods have increased; users of traditional methods have decreased.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFamily planningen_US
dc.subjectMarried womenen_US
dc.subjectReproductive ageen_US
dc.subjectRural areasen_US
dc.subjectPublic, environmental & occupational healthen_US
dc.subjectObstetrics & gynecologyen_US
dc.titleThe comparison of reproductive health data in a rural district in Turkey (1981-2001)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000181137500007tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0037004864tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Halk Sağlığı Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0983-4904tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage234tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage237tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume7tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue4tr_TR
dc.relation.journalEuropean Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Careen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorAytekin, Necla Tugay-
dc.contributor.buuauthorPala, Kayıhan-
dc.contributor.buuauthorAkis, Nalan-
dc.contributor.buuauthorNacarküçük, Seher-
dc.contributor.buuauthorAytekin, Hamdi-
dc.contributor.researcheridF-7816-2013tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed12648296tr_TR
dc.subject.wosPublic, environmental & occupational healthen_US
dc.subject.wosObstetrics & gynecologyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.contributor.scopusid6507469861tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6603159416tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6603181481tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid8070204200tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusFamily Planning; Birth Control; Contraceptive Agentsen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCoitusen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHealth surveyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeInterviewen_US
dc.subject.emtreeIntrauterine contraceptive deviceen_US
dc.subject.emtreePriority journalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeReproductive healthen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRural areaen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTurkey (republic)en_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.