Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/24098
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-14T07:53:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-14T07:53:52Z-
dc.date.issued2010-02-
dc.identifier.citationAlgın, O. vd. (2010). "The efficiency of PC-MRI in diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and prediction of shunt response". Academic Radiology, 17(2), 181-187.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1076-6332-
dc.identifier.issn1878-4046-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2009.08.011-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1076633209004966-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/24098-
dc.description.abstractRationale and Objectives: In this prospective study, we aimed to reveal the efficiency of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) and prediction of shunt response. Materials and Methods: The study group consisted of 43 patients with INPH diagnosis and 15 asymptomatic age-matched controls. PC-MRI studies were applied on cerebral aqueduct and superior sagittal sinus (SSS) in all the cases. Results: The maximum and mean cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow velocities were significantly higher in the INPH patients compared with the controls (P < .05). CSF stroke volume (43.2 +/- 63.8 mu L) and output/min (3921 +/- 5668 mu L) were remarkably higher in the NPH group compared with the control group (3.9 +/- 3.9 mu L, 439 +/- 487 mu L, respectively) (P < .05). Maximum and mean venous velocity values of the INPH patients (maximum, 19.2 +/- 4.3 cm/s; mean, 16 +/- 3.7 cm/s), were lower than those of the control group (maximum, 21.8 +/- 4.6 cm/s; mean, 18.9 +/- 3.9 cm/s) (P < .05). Stroke volume and venous output/min values of INPH patients in SSS, were significantly lower than those of the control group (P <.001, P = .007, respectively). The response of INPH patients against shunt treatment showed no statistical correlation with any of the PC-M RI parameters (P > .05). Conclusion: The measurement of CSF venous flow velocities with PC-MRI is a noninvasive test that benefits INPH diagnosis, but remains inadequate in prediction of response against shunt treatment.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectCerebral blood flowen_US
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subjectNormal pressure hydrocephalusen_US
dc.subjectPC-MRIen_US
dc.subjectCerebrospinal fluid flow dynamicsen_US
dc.subjectSubarachnoid spaceen_US
dc.subjectShunten_US
dc.subjectCerebrospinal-fluid flowen_US
dc.subjectStroke volumeen_US
dc.subjectHealthy-volunteersen_US
dc.subjectCerebral aqueducten_US
dc.subjectArachnoid cystsen_US
dc.subjectPhaseen_US
dc.subjectDynamicsen_US
dc.subjectPathophysiologyen_US
dc.subjectQuantificationen_US
dc.subjectCommunicationen_US
dc.subjectRadiology, nuclear medicine & medical imagingen_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshCerebrospinal fluiden_US
dc.subject.meshCerebrospinal fluid shuntsen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshHydrocephalus, normal pressureen_US
dc.subject.meshImage enhancementen_US
dc.subject.meshImage interpretation, computer-assisteden_US
dc.subject.meshMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.meshPrognosisen_US
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of resultsen_US
dc.subject.meshSensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subject.meshTreatment outcomeen_US
dc.titleThe efficiency of PC-MRI in diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and prediction of shunt responseen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000273834100008tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-73049118568tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3425-0740tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3877-8366tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage181tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage187tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume17tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue2tr_TR
dc.relation.journalAcademic Radiologyen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorAlgın, Oktay-
dc.contributor.buuauthorHakyemez, Bahattin-
dc.contributor.buuauthorParlak, Müfit-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAI-2318-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8521-2021tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed19910214tr_TR
dc.subject.wosRadiology, nuclear medicine & medical imagingen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ2en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid23995109100tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6602527239tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7003589220tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusNormal Pressure Hydrocephalus; Intracranial Pressure; Cerebrospinal Fluid Shuntingen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeAgeden_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBrain aqueducten_US
dc.subject.emtreeCerebrospinal fluid flowen_US
dc.subject.emtreeClinical articleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFlow rateen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHeart stroke volumeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeNormotensive hydrocephalusen_US
dc.subject.emtreeNuclear magnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subject.emtreePhase contrast microscopyen_US
dc.subject.emtreePredictionen_US
dc.subject.emtreePriority journalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeProspective studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeShuntingen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSuperior sagittal sinusen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment responseen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.