Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/24291
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T12:09:40Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-25T12:09:40Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationDoǧan, H. S. vd. (2011). ''What is the adequacy of biopsies for prostate sampling?''. Urologic Oncology-Seminars and Original Investigations, 29(3), 280-283.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1078-1439-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.03.014-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107814390900088X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/24291-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the adequacy of the samples obtained by prostate biopsies and the factors those could affect this adequacy. Materials and methods: Three hundred seventy-eight patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy have been included into the study. The biopsy samples have been retrospectively reviewed in terms of presence of prostatic glandular elements and prostatic tissue. Factors which may affect the presence of glandular elements have been investigated. Results: The mean age, PSA level, and prostate volume were 65 +/- 8.1 years, 13.6 +/- 17.8 ng/ml, and 52.5 +/- 29.8 ml, respectively. Overall cancer detection rate was 25.3%. The highest incidence of absence of prostatic glandular elements was detected at apical (21.8%) and far lateral (21.5%) biopsy samples. The overall rate of absence of glandular elements was 0.16. Absence of glandular elements in at least 1 sample of the biopsy set was detected in 50% of patients. This figure was 27.8% and 16.1% for the absence of glands in at least 3 and 5 samples of the biopsy set, respectively. These results have also been found to be operator-dependent. For patients with PSA between 4 and 10 ng/ml, we found that cancer detection rate was lower in patients with absence of glandular elements. When the possible factors were analyzed, age, PSA, prostate volume, findings of prostate examination, and presence of cancer were not found to be effective on these parameters, whereas the most important factor was the biopsy localization. Conclusion: Our study showed that prostatic glandular elements, which are keys for histological diagnosis, were absent in a significant number of prostatic biopsy samples and patients. This inadequacy was most prominent in apical and far lateral biopsy specimens and found to be operator-dependent.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectOncologyen_US
dc.subjectUrology & nephrologyen_US
dc.subjectBiopsyen_US
dc.subjectCanceren_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectGlandular coverageen_US
dc.subjectPathologyen_US
dc.subjectProstateen_US
dc.subjectEnd-cut techniqueen_US
dc.subjectLong-core needleen_US
dc.subjectCancer detectionen_US
dc.subjectTissueen_US
dc.subjectGlanden_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshBiopsy, needleen_US
dc.subject.meshEndosonographyen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshPrognosisen_US
dc.subject.meshProstateen_US
dc.subject.meshProstate-specific antigenen_US
dc.subject.meshProstatic neoplasmsen_US
dc.titleWhat is the adequacy of biopsies for prostate sampling?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000290779400010tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79955769192tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Üroloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Patoloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage280tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage283tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume29tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue3tr_TR
dc.relation.journalUrologic Oncology-Seminars and Original Investigationsen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorDoǧan, Hasan Serkan-
dc.contributor.buuauthorAytaç, Berna-
dc.contributor.buuauthorKordan, Yakup-
dc.contributor.buuauthorGasanov, Feyzullah-
dc.contributor.buuauthorYavaşçaoǧlu, İsmet-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-9746-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridABH-5513-2020tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed19450999tr_TR
dc.subject.wosOncologytr_TR
dc.subject.wosUrology & nephrologyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ2 (Oncology)en_US
dc.wos.quartileQ1 (Urology & nephrology)en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid7005856022tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56527372000tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid9633365800tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56629254000tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6603612497tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusDigital Rectal Examination; Prostate; Gleason Scoreen_US
dc.subject.emtreeProstate specific antigenen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAgeden_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBiopsy localizationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCancer diagnosisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeExocrine glanden_US
dc.subject.emtreeGroups by ageen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHistopathologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHuman tissueen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeOrgan sizeen_US
dc.subject.emtreePriority journalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeProstate biopsyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeProstate canceren_US
dc.subject.emtreeProtein blood levelen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRetrospective studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSamplingen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSampling adequacyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTissue distributionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTransrectal ultrasonographyen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.