Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/24855
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-07T06:11:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-07T06:11:37Z-
dc.date.issued2001-08-
dc.identifier.citationYılmazlar, T. vd. (2002). "Laparoscopic management of malfunctioning peritoneal dialysis catheters". Surgical Endoscopy and Other Invervential Techniques, 15(8), 820-822.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0930-2794-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080008-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs004640080008-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/24855-
dc.descriptionBu çalışma, 28 Mart-1 Nisan 2000 tarihleri arasında Atlanta[ABD]'da düzenlenen Annual Meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES)'da bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.tr_TR
dc.description.abstractBackground: Continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) is an established alternative method to hemodialysis for treating end-stage renal disease patients. However, this method is associated with a significant number of complications, such as catheter malposition, omental wrapping, and infection. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of laparoscopy in the treatment of malfunctioning CAPD catheters. Methods: Between November 1994 and June 1999, a total of 16 patients with CAPD underwent laparoscopy for the evaluation and management of CAPD catheter dysfunction. Two trocars (10-mm and 5-mm) were used. Recorded data included patient demographics, catheter implantation method, date of malfunction, cause of dysfunction, procedure performed, complications, and catheter outcome. Results: The primary etiology of dysfunction was omentum and/or small bowel wrapping with adhesions in eight cases, malpositioning in five cases, and infection in the remaining three cases. Adhesiolysis was performed in the eight cases with adhesions. In the five cases with malpositioning but no adhesions, the catheters were repositioned in the pelvic cavity. Two catheters had to be withdrawn because of infection. In one case with tunnel infection, the catheters were exchanged simultaneously. There was only one perioperative complication, consisting of temporary dialysate leakage. There were no mechanical or infection problems. The overall success rate of catheter function (> 30 days after laparoscopy) was 100%, except for two cases in which the catheters had to be removed. Conclusion: Laparoscopy is a highly effective and successful method for the evaluation and management of peritoneal dialysis catheter dysfunction.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSociety of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeonsen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPeritoneal dialysisen_US
dc.subjectCatheter malfunctionen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectRenal diseaseen_US
dc.subjectKidneyen_US
dc.subjectPlacementen_US
dc.subjectVideolaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectTenckhoffen_US
dc.subject.meshAdhesionsen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshCandidiasisen_US
dc.subject.meshEquipment failureen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshKidney failure, chronicen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subject.meshPeritonitisen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.meshPeritoneal dialysis, continuous ambulatoryen_US
dc.subject.meshTreatment outcomeen_US
dc.titleLaparoscopic management of malfunctioning peritoneal dialysis cathetersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.typeProceedings Paperen_US
dc.identifier.wos000170319300010tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0034920762tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Cerrahi Bilimler Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage820tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage822tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume15tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue8tr_TR
dc.relation.journalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniquesen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorYılmazlar, Tuncay-
dc.contributor.buuauthorYavuz, Mahmut-
dc.contributor.buuauthorCeylan, Hasan Hüseyintr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed11443441tr_TR
dc.subject.wosSurgeryen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.wosCPCISen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.contributor.scopusid6701800362tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7006244754tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid57213447556tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusDialysis Catheter; Peritoneal Dialysis; Hydrothoraxen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdhesionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeContinuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCatheter infectionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeOperation durationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLaparoscopic surgeryen_US
dc.subject.emtreePeritoneal catheteren_US
dc.subject.emtreePeroperative complicationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeClinical articleen_US
dc.subject.emtreePriority journalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeOmentumen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.