Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25225
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-21T11:04:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-21T11:04:52Z-
dc.date.issued2004-12-
dc.identifier.citationYılmaz, E. vd. (2004). “Brucellar spondylitis - Review of 25 cases”. JCR-Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, 10(6), 300-307.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1076-1608-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.rhu.0000147048.44396.90-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/25225-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Brucellar spondylitis is one of the most serious complications of brucellosis. It should be considered in patients who have back pain and neurologic disorders as well as systemic symptoms and findings in or from endemic areas such as Turkey. This report describes important features of the disease. Methods: Twenty-five patients with brucellar spordylitis were retrospectively evaluated in terms of their clinical, laboratory, and radiologic features and their response to different treatment regimens. Results: The most common symptoms of brucellar spondylitis were back pain, fever, and sweating. Rose Bengal tests were positive in all of these patients. Brucella species was isolated from blood cultures of 8 (32%) patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed that the lumbar segment was the most frequently involved region. Different combination regimens including 2 or 3 antibiotics were used. Combination of tetracycline (especially doxycycline) and streptomycin was the most widely used therapy regimen. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and rifampin were also included in some combination therapies. In this series, the mean duration of antimicrobial therapy was 130 +/- 45.6 days (range, 77-281 days), and 92% of patients received therapy for greater than or equal to 90 days. There were no mortalities in this study. Conclusions: Brucellar spondylitis should be considered in patients with back pain and neurologic disorders as well as systemic symptoms and findings in endemic areas. MR imaging is recommended in suspected cases. The patients can be treated effectively treated with appropriate antibiotic combinations. Follow up is important because relapses can occur.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams and Wilkinsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectRheumatologyen_US
dc.subjectBrucellosisen_US
dc.subjectBrucellar spondylitisen_US
dc.subjectSpinal infectionsen_US
dc.subjectDiagnosisen_US
dc.subjectArthritisen_US
dc.titleBrucellar spondylitis - Review of 25 casesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000225606000003tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-10044261935tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5428-3630tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0463-6818tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage300tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage307tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume10tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue6tr_TR
dc.relation.journalJCR-Journal of Clinical Rheumatologyen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorYılmaz, Emel-
dc.contributor.buuauthorParlak, Müfit-
dc.contributor.buuauthorAkalın, Halis-
dc.contributor.buuauthorHeper, Yasemin-
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzakın, Cüneyt-
dc.contributor.buuauthorMıstık, Reşit-
dc.contributor.buuauthorOral, Haluk Barbaros-
dc.contributor.buuauthorHelvacı, Safiye-
dc.contributor.buuauthorTöre, Okan-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAU-8952-2020tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-6506-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8392-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridK-7285-2012tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed17043537tr_TR
dc.subject.wosRheumatologyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ4en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid22037135100tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7003589220tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid57207553671tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56191003300tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid57200678942tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6602564624tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7004498001tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6602103491tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6505909596tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusCase Report; Agglutination Tests; Zoonosisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAntibiotic agenten_US
dc.subject.emtreeCiprofloxacinen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCotrimoxazoleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDoxycyclineen_US
dc.subject.emtreeOfloxacinen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRifampicinen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRose bengalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeStreptomycinen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTetracyclineen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeAgeden_US
dc.subject.emtreeBackacheen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBacterium isolationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBlood cultureen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBrucellaen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBrucellar spondylitisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFeveren_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLumbar spineen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeNuclear magnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subject.emtreePriority journalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRadiologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRetrospective studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeReviewen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSpondylitisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSweatingen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment outcomeen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.