Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25245
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-22T05:47:20Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-22T05:47:20Z-
dc.date.issued2010-08-
dc.identifier.citationKaya, E. vd. (2010). "Subcutaneous closed-suction drainage does not affect surgical site infection rate following elective abdominal operations: A prospective randomized clinical trial". Acta Chirurgica Belgica, 110(4), 457-462.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-5458-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2010.11680655-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00015458.2010.11680655-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/25245-
dc.description.abstractPurpose : To evaluate whether subcutaneous closed-suction drainage (SCSD) would decrease the SSI rate in elective abdominal operations. Methods : Participants were randomly assigned to have subcutaneous drains or not following elective abdominal surgery. The fascia and incision closure technique and antimicrobial prophylaxis were standardised. In the drain cohort, SCSD was applied after fascia closure. The drain was removed on postoperative day three. Patient characteristics, body mass index (BMI) and the depth of subcutaneous fatty tissue (SCFT) were noted. The incisional SSI rates were analysed. Results : There were 210 patients in the drain group and 192 in the no-drain group. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of demographics, BMI or SCFTs. The overall SSI rate was 7.7% and was 5.7% in the drain group and 9.9% in the no-drain group (p = 0.116). Neither BMI nor subcutaneous skin depth affected the SSI rate. However, subgroup analysis revealed that the SSI rate was lower in patients with drains who had undergone resection of colorectal malignancies or had lower abdominal incisions (p < 0.03). Conclusions : The overall incisional SSI rate was comparable between the drain and no-drain groups. However, subcutaneous closed-suction drainage was not found effective in preventing SSI in our study except in a subgroup of patients with colorectal malignancies and lower abdominal incisions.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSurgical site infectionen_US
dc.subjectAbdominal incisionen_US
dc.subjectSubcutaneous drainageen_US
dc.subjectSuperficial wound disruptionen_US
dc.subjectCesarean deliveryen_US
dc.subjectObese womenen_US
dc.subjectTissueen_US
dc.subjectClosureen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectSystemen_US
dc.subjectIncisionsen_US
dc.subjectSutureen_US
dc.subjectDepthen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshBody mass indexen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.meshProspective studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshRisk fatcorsen_US
dc.subject.meshSuctionen_US
dc.subject.meshSurgical wound infectionen_US
dc.subject.meshSuture techniquesen_US
dc.titleSubcutaneous closed-suction drainage does not affect surgical site infection rate following elective abdominal operations: A prospective randomized clinical trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000281967100007tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77956630237tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9562-4195tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage457tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage462tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume110tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue4tr_TR
dc.relation.journalActa Chirurgica Belgicaen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorKaya, Ekrem-
dc.contributor.buuauthorPaksoy, Ela-
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖztürk, Ersin-
dc.contributor.buuauthorSığırlı, Deniz-
dc.contributor.buuauthorBilgel, Halil-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAA-7472-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-7319-2021tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed20919669tr_TR
dc.subject.wosSurgeryen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ4en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid7004568109tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid24768037900tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid35070171400tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid24482063400tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6507422028tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusCesarean Section; Staples; Endometritisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeAgeden_US
dc.subject.emtreeBody massen_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.emtreeProceduresen_US
dc.subject.emtreeProspective studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRisk factoren_US
dc.subject.emtreeSuctionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSurgical wound infectionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSuturing methoden_US
Appears in Collections:PubMed
Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.