Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25360
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Namık-
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Alpaslan-
dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Yüksel-
dc.contributor.authorAvcu, Bülent-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-25T13:18:23Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-25T13:18:23Z-
dc.date.issued2012-03-
dc.identifier.citationŞahin, N. vd. (2012). "Accuracy of anatomical references used for rotational alignment of tibial component in total knee arthroplasty". Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 20(3), 565-570.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0942-2056-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1606-x-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00167-011-1606-x-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/25360-
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to research which was the most reliable of the four techniques based on local anatomic markers used to determine tibial component rotation in total knee arthroplasty, and whether the markers varied in knees with varus deformity. The study included 33 knees with a normal anatomic axis and 32 knees with a varus deformity and osteoarthritis. On the MR images, the femoral transepicondylar axis (TEA) was determined and transposed to the standard tibial resection level. At this level, four axes were drawn on the axial sections: tibial posterior condylar line (PC), tibial plateau anterior line (AC), a vertical line (AA) drawn to Akagi's line, and the maximal mediolateral distance (MMLD). The relationships of these lines and the transposed TEA were compared between two groups. In all the knees, the mean values of the PC, AA, and MMLD axes compared to TEA reference were 5.5A degrees A A +/- A 5.7 (mean +/- A SD), 7A degrees A A +/- A 3.2, and 6.7A degrees A A +/- A 8.1 internal rotation, respectively, and the AC axis was 8.9A degrees A A +/- A 6.7 external rotation. In the AC, AA, and MMLD axes, the change occured because of varus deformity was statistically meaningful. For all the observers, the axis with the least SD and the most accuracy was the AA axis. Of the four axes used to determine tibial component rotation, only the PC axis is not affected by varus deformity, and the least affected axis according to the observers was the AA axis, and thus the AA and PC axes can be used for guidance in determining the rotation of the tibial component. Prognostic studies-investigating natural history and evaluating the effect of a patient characteristic: High-quality prospective cohort study with > 80% follow-up, and all patients enrolled at same time point in disease, Level I.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectOrthopedicsen_US
dc.subjectSport sciencesen_US
dc.subjectSurgeryen_US
dc.subjectTotal knee arthroplastyen_US
dc.subjectRotational alignmenten_US
dc.subjectTibial componenten_US
dc.subjectSurgical techniqueen_US
dc.subjectReference linesen_US
dc.subjectFemoral componenten_US
dc.subjectTransepicondylar axisen_US
dc.subjectAnteroposterior axisen_US
dc.subjectProximal tibiaen_US
dc.subjectVariabilityen_US
dc.subjectVarusen_US
dc.subject.meshArthroplasty, replacement, kneeen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshKnee jointen_US
dc.subject.meshMagnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subject.meshOsteoarthritis, kneeen_US
dc.subject.meshRotationen_US
dc.subject.meshTibiaen_US
dc.titleAccuracy of anatomical references used for rotational alignment of tibial component in total knee arthroplastyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000300517800019tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84857440040tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Ortopedi ve Travmatoloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Biyoistatistik Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0297-846Xtr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage565tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage570tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume20tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue3tr_TR
dc.relation.journalKnee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopyen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorAtıcı, Teoman-
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzkaya, Güven-
dc.contributor.researcheridA-4421-2016tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridA-5095-2018tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationSanayitr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed21761232tr_TR
dc.subject.wosOrthopedicsen_US
dc.subject.wosSport sciencesen_US
dc.subject.wosSurgeryen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ1en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid7801647288tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid16316866500tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusKnee Replacement Arthroplasties; Thighs; Collateral Ligamentsen_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHistologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeKneeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeKnee arthroplastyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeKnee osteoarthritisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMethodologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeNuclear magnetic resonance imagingen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRotationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTibiaen_US
Appears in Collections:PubMed
Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons