Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25707
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-11T13:24:09Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-11T13:24:09Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-08-26 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Kahya, S. vd. (2010). "Real-time PCR culture and serology for the diagnosis of mycoplasma gallisepticum in chicken breeder flocks". Veterinary Microbiology, 144(3-4), 319-324. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0378-1135 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1873-2542 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.01.012 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378113510000489 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25707 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study aimed to compare a real-time PCR (rPCR) test with improved detection limit to serology and culture for the detection of Mycoplasma gallisepticum (MG) infection in chicken breeder flocks. Six hundred and forty-six blood and tracheal swab samples belonging to 31 grandparent chicken breeder flocks were tested by rPCR. The detection limit of rPCR was 0.9 pg mu l(-1), with pure MG S6 strain DNA and 100 colony forming units (CFUs) ml(-1), where both pure culture and tracheal swabs were artificially spiked with the same strain. The seropositive flock rate based on both MG RPA and HI were calculated as 48.4% (15/ 31) and 32.3% (10/31), respectively, while culture- and rPCR-positive flock rates were 16.1% (5/31) and 29.0% (9/31), respectively. On flock-based analysis, culture method detected 5 out of 10 MG seropositive flocks (sensitivity 50%, specificity 100%), whereas rPCR detected 8 out of 10 flocks (sensitivity 80%, specificity 95%). Agreements between serology and culture, and serology and rPCR were 83.9% and 90.3%, respectively. On individual sample-based analysis, culture method detected 26 out of 78 MG seropositive chicken (sensitivity 33%, specificity 100%), whereas rPCR detected 51 out of 78 MG seropositive chickens (sensitivity 65%, specificity 96%). There was 91.9% and 91.4% agreement between serology and culture, and serology and rPCR, respectively. Results of this study indicate that the rPCR with improved in vitro detection limit could detect MG in seropositive chicken flocks. Therefore, we advise the use of rPCR and/or culture for confirmation of serology results obtained from screening MG infection in chicken flocks. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Mycoplasma gallisepticum | en_US |
dc.subject | Real-time PCR | en_US |
dc.subject | Chicken | en_US |
dc.subject | Polymerase-chain-reaction | en_US |
dc.subject | Avian mycoplasmas | en_US |
dc.subject | Synoviae | en_US |
dc.subject | Strain | en_US |
dc.subject | Assay | en_US |
dc.subject | Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject | Veterinary sciences | en_US |
dc.subject | Gallus gallus | en_US |
dc.subject | Mycoplasma gallisepticum | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Animals | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Breeding | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Chickens | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Mycoplasma gallisepticum | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Mycoplasma infections | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Polymerase chain reaction | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Poultry diseases | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Sensitivity and specificity | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Serologic tests | en_US |
dc.title | Real-time PCR culture and serology for the diagnosis of mycoplasma gallisepticum in chicken breeder flocks | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000281358600008 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-77955572600 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Veterinerlik Fakültesi/Klinik Öncesi Bilimler Bölümü. | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Veterinerlik Fakültesi/Gıda Hijyeni ve Teknolojileri Bölümü. | tr_TR |
dc.relation.bap | 2006/29 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | 319 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.endpage | 324 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 144 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issue | 3-4 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.journal | Veterinary Microbiology | en_US |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Kahya, Serpil | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Temelli, Seran | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Eyigör, Ayşegül | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Çarlı, Kamil Tayfun | - |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAI-1092-2021 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAH-2842-2021 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAI-1101-2021 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.researcherid | E-3867-2010 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 20149561 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.wos | Microbiology | en_US |
dc.subject.wos | Veterinary sciences | en_US |
dc.indexed.wos | SCIE | en_US |
dc.indexed.scopus | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indexed.pubmed | PubMed | en_US |
dc.wos.quartile | Q1 (Veterinary sciences) | en_US |
dc.wos.quartile | Q2 | en_US |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 35368679200 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 6506404118 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 6602558950 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 6601971539 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.scopus | Mycoplasma Synoviae; Carpodacus Mexicanus; Poultry Industry | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Bacterial strain | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Bacterium culture | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Bacterium detection | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Chicken | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Controlled study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Herd | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Mycoplasma gallisepticum | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Mycoplasma gallisepticum infection | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Nonhuman | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Real time polymerase chain reaction | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Serology | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.