Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/27126
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKarahan, Ahmed-
dc.contributor.authorHranitz, John M.-
dc.contributor.authorKaraca, İsmail-
dc.contributor.authorWells, Harrington-
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-13T13:30:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-13T13:30:57Z-
dc.date.issued2015-11-
dc.identifier.citationKarahan, A. vd. (2015). "Sublethal imidacloprid effects on honey bee flower choices when foraging". Ecotoxicology, 24(9), 2017-2025.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0963-9292-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-015-1537-2-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10646-015-1537-2-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/27126-
dc.description.abstractNeonicotinoids, systemic neuro-active pesticides similar to nicotine, are widely used in agriculture and are being investigated for a role in honey bee colony losses. We examined one neonicotinoid pesticide, imidacloprid, for its effects on the foraging behavior of free-flying honey bees (Apis mellifera anatoliaca) visiting artificial blue and white flowers. Imidacloprid doses, ranging from 1/5 to 1/50 of the reported LD50, were fed to bees orally. The study consisted of three experimental parts performed sequentially without interruption. In Part 1, both flower colors contained a 4 mu L 1 M sucrose solution reward. Part 2 offered bees 4 mu L of 1.5 M sucrose solution in blue flowers and a 4 mu L 0.5 M sucrose solution reward in white flowers. In Part 3 we reversed the sugar solution rewards, while keeping the flower color consistent. Each experiment began 30 min after administration of the pesticide. We recorded the percentage of experimental bees that returned to forage after treatment. We also recorded the visitation rate, number of flowers visited, and floral reward choices of the bees that foraged after treatment. The forager return rate declined linearly with increasing imidacloprid dose. The number of foraging trips by returning bees was also affected adversely. However, flower fidelity was not affected by imidacloprid dose. Foragers visited both blue and white flowers extensively in Part 1, and showed greater fidelity for the flower color offering the higher sugar solution reward in Parts 2 and 3. Although larger samples sizes are needed, our study suggests that imidacloprid may not affect the ability to select the higher nectar reward when rewards were reversed. We observed acute, mild effects on foraging by honey bees, so mild that storage of imidacloprid tainted-honey is very plausible and likely to be found in honey bee colonies.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSüleyman Demirel Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (NSF) (1263327)en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectApis melliferaen_US
dc.subjectForaging behavioren_US
dc.subjectNeonicotinoidsen_US
dc.subjectNeonicotinoid insecticidesen_US
dc.subjectLearning performancesen_US
dc.subjectPollination servicesen_US
dc.subjectPesticideen_US
dc.subjectExposureen_US
dc.subjectMetaanalysisen_US
dc.subjectSensitivityen_US
dc.subjectConstancyen_US
dc.subjectToxicityen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental sciences & ecologyen_US
dc.subjectToxicologyen_US
dc.subjectApis melliferaen_US
dc.subjectApis mellifera anatoliacaen_US
dc.subjectApoideaen_US
dc.subjectBeeen_US
dc.subjectFloweren_US
dc.subjectForaging behavioren_US
dc.subjectPesticideen_US
dc.subjectPollution effecten_US
dc.subjectSublethal effecten_US
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_US
dc.subject.meshBeesen_US
dc.subject.meshChoice behavioren_US
dc.subject.meshFeeding behavioren_US
dc.subject.meshFlowersen_US
dc.subject.meshImidazolesen_US
dc.subject.meshInsecticidesen_US
dc.subject.meshNitro compoundsen_US
dc.titleSublethal imidacloprid effects on honey bee flower choices when foragingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000365757900019tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84948105114tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Arıcılık Geliştirme Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi.tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage2017tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage2025tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume24tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue9tr_TR
dc.relation.journalEcotoxicologyen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇakmak, İbrahim-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-2558-2021tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içitr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt dışıtr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed26415950tr_TR
dc.subject.wosEcologyen_US
dc.subject.wosEnvironmental sciencesen_US
dc.subject.wosToxicologyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ2en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid57207796431tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusBombus; Bees; Neonicotinoidsen_US
dc.subject.emtreeImidaclopriden_US
dc.subject.emtreeSucroseen_US
dc.subject.emtreeImidaclopriden_US
dc.subject.emtreeImidazole derivativeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeInsecticideen_US
dc.subject.emtreeNitro derivativeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAnimal experimenten_US
dc.subject.emtreeApisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeApis mellifera anatoliacaen_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeColoren_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFloweren_US
dc.subject.emtreeForageren_US
dc.subject.emtreeForaging behavioren_US
dc.subject.emtreeHoneyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHoneybeeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLD50en_US
dc.subject.emtreeNectaren_US
dc.subject.emtreeNonhumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreePriority journalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRewarden_US
dc.subject.emtreeAnimalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBeeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDecision makingen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDrug effectsen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFeeding behavioren_US
dc.subject.emtreePhysiologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.