Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/27736
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-06T06:51:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-06T06:51:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Çelik, H. ve Katkat, A. V. (2010). "Comparison of various chemical extraction methods used for determination of the available iron amounts of calcareous soils". Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 41(3), 290-300. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0010-3624 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/00103620903460807 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00103620903460807 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11452/27736 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study was conducted to compare the most appropriate method for the evaluation of available iron (Fe) status of calcareous soils by using nine different chemical extraction methods. Leaf and soil samples were collected from nine peach (Prunus persica L.) orchards, each of which included green, slightly chlorotic, and severely chlorotic peach trees. According to the chlorosis degrees of the leaves, total and active Fe contents and some soil properties were determined. Relationships between these parameters and Fe amounts obtained from the methods were correlated. Among the methods tested, method 3 (M3) [0.05 N hydrochloric acid (HCl) + 0.025 N sulfuric acid (H(2)SO(4))] and method 8 (M8) 0.05 M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) (pH 7.0) were the most suitable methods to indicate the available Fe status of the soils. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Francis | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Available iron | en_US |
dc.subject | Extraction methods | en_US |
dc.subject | Peach | en_US |
dc.subject | Soil | en_US |
dc.subject | Micro-nutrients | en_US |
dc.subject | Peach-trees | en_US |
dc.subject | Chlorosis | en_US |
dc.subject | Leaves | en_US |
dc.subject | Macro | en_US |
dc.subject | Deficiency | en_US |
dc.subject | Copper | en_US |
dc.subject | Citrus | en_US |
dc.subject | Zinc | en_US |
dc.subject | Agriculture | en_US |
dc.subject | Plant sciences | en_US |
dc.subject | Chemistry | en_US |
dc.subject | Prunus | en_US |
dc.subject | Prunus persica | en_US |
dc.subject | Acetic acid | en_US |
dc.subject | Calcareous soil | en_US |
dc.subject | Comparative study | en_US |
dc.subject | Dicotyledon | en_US |
dc.subject | Extraction method | en_US |
dc.subject | Hydrochloric acid | en_US |
dc.subject | Iron | en_US |
dc.subject | Soil test | tr_TR |
dc.subject | Sulfuric acid | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of various chemical extraction methods used for determination of the available iron amounts of calcareous soils | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000274286600006 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-77949336270 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Toprak Bilimi ve Bitki Besleme Bölümü. | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-4673-3843 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | 290 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.endpage | 300 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 41 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.journal | Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis | en_US |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Çelik, Hakan | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Katkat, Ali Vahap | - |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAE-5333-2021 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.researcherid | Y-5968-2018 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.wos | Agronomy | en_US |
dc.subject.wos | Plant sciences | en_US |
dc.subject.wos | Chemistry, analytical | en_US |
dc.subject.wos | Soil science | en_US |
dc.indexed.wos | SCIE | en_US |
dc.indexed.scopus | Scopus | en_US |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 14624924600 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 6505826855 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.scopus | Phytosiderophores; Chlorosis; Graminaceous Plant | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.