Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/29082
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-13T08:11:41Z-
dc.date.available2022-10-13T08:11:41Z-
dc.date.issued2016-02-03-
dc.identifier.citationDikmen, B. Y. vd. (2016). "Egg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range)". Poultry Science, 95(7), 1564-1572.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0032-5791-
dc.identifier.issn1525-3171-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pew082-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0032579119318528-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/29082-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare egg production performance and welfare traits of laying hens kept in conventional cage (CC), enriched cage (EC), and free range (FR). Lohmann Brown laying hens (n = 480 with 160 per housing type) were studied across a production cycle from placement at 17 wk until depopulation at 66 wk. The hens were randomly allocated into cages or pens of housing system groups; within each system there were four replicates with 40 hens in each pen or cage. The hen day egg production (P = 0.037), feed intake (FI) (P < 0.001), egg mass (EM) (P < 0.001), and dirty egg ratio of hens were higher in the FR system but similar in the CC and EC systems. The highest mortality ratio was found in EC system hens (P = 0.020). The best feather score was found in FR system hens (P < 0.001). The worse body wound score was found in EC system hens (P = 0.038). On the other hand, the worse bumble foot and footpad lesions were found in FR system hens (P < 0.001). The highest tibia breaking strength was found in FR system hens compared with in CC and EC system hens (P < 0.001). The highest Heterophil/Lymphocyte (H/L) ratio was found in CC system hens (P = 0.006) but the blood phosphorus (P) level was higher in FR system hens (P = 0.013). The tonic immobility, blood glucose, total cholesterol, triglyceride, and Ca values of hens were found to be similar in all systems (P > 0.05). The hens in the FR system had additional space for optimum comfort and better feather and bone traits, but the dirty egg ratio, feed consumption, and foot lesions were higher than in CC and EC systems.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAtıf Gayri Ticari Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararasıtr_TR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAgricultureen_US
dc.subjectConventional cageen_US
dc.subjectEnriched cageen_US
dc.subjectFree rangeen_US
dc.subjectEgg productionen_US
dc.subjectWelfareen_US
dc.subjectBone breaking strengthen_US
dc.subjectFoot-pad dermatitisen_US
dc.subjectProduction performanceen_US
dc.subjectQuality characteristicsen_US
dc.subjectFurnished cagesen_US
dc.subjectBlood-plasmaen_US
dc.subjectGroup-sizeen_US
dc.subject4 strainsen_US
dc.subjectPerchesen_US
dc.subjectTraitsen_US
dc.subject.meshAnimal husbandryen_US
dc.subject.meshAnimal welfareen_US
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_US
dc.subject.meshBody weighten_US
dc.subject.meshBone and bonesen_US
dc.subject.meshChickensen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHousing, animalen_US
dc.subject.meshReproductionen_US
dc.subject.meshTurkeyen_US
dc.titleEgg production and welfare of laying hens kept in different housing systems (conventional, enriched cage, and free range)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000378619000011tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84977080432tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Hayvan Bilimleri Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Veteriner Fakültesi/Zooteknik Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.relation.bapKUAP-Z-2013/15tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4397-5428tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage1564tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage1572tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume95tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue7tr_TR
dc.relation.journalPoultry Scienceen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorDikmen, Bilgehan Yılmaz-
dc.contributor.buuauthorİpek, Aydın-
dc.contributor.buuauthorŞahan, Ümran-
dc.contributor.buuauthorPetek, Metin-
dc.contributor.buuauthorSözcü, Arda-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-3973-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAA-5866-2020tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-2551-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-2966-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridG-3725-2017tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed26994200tr_TR
dc.subject.wosAgriculture, dairy & animal scienceen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.contributor.scopusid13609715000tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid57190064594tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6602128089tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7004448692tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56032385300tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusFeather Pecking; Animal Welfare; Laying Hensen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAnimalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAnimal housingen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAnimal husbandryen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAnimal welfareen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBlooden_US
dc.subject.emtreeBody weighten_US
dc.subject.emtreeBoneen_US
dc.subject.emtreeChickenen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreePhysiologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeReproductionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeStandardsen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTurkeyen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yılmaz_vd_2016.pdf124.42 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons