Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/29528
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Aslan-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-22T07:37:31Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-22T07:37:31Z-
dc.date.issued2020-05-01-
dc.identifier.citationGünseren, K. Ö. vd. (2020). "The survival of flexible ureterorenoscopes in terms of the total stone area and total usage time". Journal of Endourology, 34(5), 567-572.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0892-7790-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0761-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/end.2019.0761-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/29528-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: We investigated the survival of a flexible ureterorenoscope (FURS) in regard to the total stone area (TSA) and total usage time (TUT) to determine the cutoff values for its survival. Materials and Methods: Data were obtained from 1326 patients who underwent flexible ureterorenoscopy. The stone area and the usage time of the FURS were obtained in each case. The data from each FURS were considered as a group. The TSA was calculated as the sum of the stones for which only one FURS broke, and the TUT was calculated as the sum of the time of use within the body in all cases during the tool's survival. Data from 13 groups of 1258 patients were analyzed in regard to the TSA and TUT. Results: We found a positive correlation of the case number with the TSA and TUT. The Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.983 and 0.937 for the TSA and TUT, respectively (p < 0.05). The mean case number, TSA, and TUT where only one FURS was used were 97.38 +/- 31.34, 11,886 +/- 4567.93 mm(2), and 5160 +/- 1570.52 minutes, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic curve of the FURS survival for the TSA was 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.76-1.07). The best cutoff value for the FURS survival was 6838 mm(2), with a sensitivity of 91%. The results for the AUC and the best cutoff value in regard to the TUT for using only one FURS were 66.7% (95% CI: 0.4-0.93) and 4617 minutes, respectively, with a sensitivity of 66%. If the cutoff value is taken as the average value of the TSA and TUT, the sensitivity rate drops to similar to 58% and 50%, respectively. Conclusion: FURS can be safely used when the stone area and TUT are about 9158 mm(2) and 4617 minutes, respectively, with a sensitivity of 66%.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Lieberten_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFlexible ureterorenoscopeen_US
dc.subjectThe survival of the flexible ureterorenoscopeen_US
dc.subjectThe durability of the flexible ureterorenoscopeen_US
dc.subjectCost-effectivenessen_US
dc.subjectDurabilityen_US
dc.subjectLaseren_US
dc.subjectUreteroscopesen_US
dc.subjectUrology & nephrologyen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshKidneyen_US
dc.subject.meshKidney calculien_US
dc.subject.meshUreteroscopyen_US
dc.titleThe survival of flexible ureterorenoscopes in terms of the total stone area and total usage timeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000524990800001tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85084924936tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Üroloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8673-3093tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage567tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage572tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume34tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue5tr_TR
dc.relation.journalJournal of Endourologyen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorGünseren, Kadir Ömür-
dc.contributor.buuauthorKılıçarslan, Hakan-
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇiçek, Mehmet Çağatay-
dc.contributor.researcheridABC-9924-2020tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içitr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed31992073tr_TR
dc.subject.wosUrology & nephrologyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ2en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid56664496600tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid57204319673tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56007473800tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusNephrolithiasis; Ultrasonic Lithotripsy; Percutaneous Nephrolithotomyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCorrelational studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.emtreePatient safetyen_US
dc.subject.emtreePriority journalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRetrospective studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSurvivalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTertiary care centeren_US
dc.subject.emtreeUreter stoneen_US
dc.subject.emtreeUreteroscopyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeUrolithiasisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeKidneyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeNephrolithiasisen_US
Appears in Collections:PubMed
Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.