Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/29594
Title: Comparing the ocular surface effects of topical vancomycin and linezolid for treating bacterial keratitis
Authors: Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Göz Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0003-0995-5260
0000-0002-0932-6977
Budak, Berna Akova
Baykara, Mehmet
Kıvanç, Sertaç Argun
Yılmaz, Hakan
Çiçek, Serhat
AAH-6518-2021
ABE-3033-2020
ABI-7051-2020
55370489800
23093006700
47861204900
57188580909
57188593392
Keywords: Ophthalmology
Toxicology
Linezolid
Vancomycin
Keratitis
Resistant staphylococcus-aureus
Efficacy
Safety
Model
Issue Date: 1-Jun-2015
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Citation: Budak, B. A. vd. (2016). "Comparing the ocular surface effects of topical vancomycin and linezolid for treating bacterial keratitis". Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology, 35(2), 126-130.
Abstract: Background: Vancomycin is the gold standard in combination therapy for severe and resistant gram-positive keratitis and in particular for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections. The aim of this study was to report the ocular surface toxicity and scoring in patients whose treatment shifted to topical linezolid/ceftazidime from topical vancomycin/ceftazidime due to their vancomycin intolerance. Methods: A retrospective, interventional case series of bacterial keratitis was treated with topical linezolid (one drop of 0.2% solution per eye), administered hourly until epithelization and then gradually decreased. The number and extent of punctate epithelial erosions were noted across the entire surface of the cornea. Ocular discomfort was assessed by means of (a) patient-reported pain upon instillation of the medication (vancomycin/linezolid), (b) reported burning sensation between doses and (c) reported foreign-body sensation. No ocular surface toxicity related to linezolid use was noted. Patients were followed for at least 2 months after treatment between April and December 2013. Results: Of the seven patients included in the study (age range: 2-88 years; five females, two males), complete epithelization and resolution was achieved in five patients. One patient was treated with linezolid after penetrating keratoplasty. The second culture of another patient with impending perforation despite linezolid/ceftazidime therapy yielded Fusarium spp., so he underwent tectonic keratoplasty. The mean ocular surface score was 9.4 +/- 1.6 during vancomycin treatment and 5.9 +/- 1.3 during linezolid treatment after discontinuation of vancomycin. The topical linezolid score was significantly lower (p = 0.027). Conclusions: Topical linezolid may be better tolerated, according to the mean ocular surface score, than topical vancomycin by some patients and can be considered an alternative for patients who do not well tolerate vancomycin.
URI: https://doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2015.1058273
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/15569527.2015.1058273
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/29594
ISSN: 1556-9527
1556-9535
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.