Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/29630
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKalkan, Hatice-
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-29T12:04:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-11-29T12:04:49Z-
dc.date.issued2016-08-01-
dc.identifier.citationSucu, E. vd. (2016). "Effects of ensiling density on nutritive value of maize and sorghum silages". Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 45(10), 596-603.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1806-9290-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902016001000003-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=81e08bc3-a320-4e8c-a85a-0b8f8904fd1c-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/29630-
dc.description.abstractStudies were conducted to determine the effects of different ensiling densities on fermentation, aerobic stability, and nutritive value of maize and sorghum silages. Maize and sorghum were harvested at dough (363 g/kg) and milk stages (275 g/kg), respectively. Herbages were chopped approximately 1.5 cm after harvest and then ensiled in mini silos at high and low-bulk densities for 8.5 weeks. Different bulk densities were achieved by ensiling different weights of herbage in the fixed-volume mini silos (1.5-L anaerobic jars, Weck, Germany). The obtained dry matter (DM) densities were 168 and 216 kg of DM/m(3) for maize forage and 132 and 178 kg of DM/m(3) for sorghum forage. Fermentation kinetics, the rate of aerobic deterioration upon aerobic exposure, and nutrient digestibility were followed during the periods of ensiling (on days 2, 4, 8, 15, and 60). In all cases, increased packing density resulted in silages with lower acetate content, ammonium N levels, and fermentation losses, but lactate content did not differ. Butyrate was detected in appreciable amounts only in sorghum silage. Propionate was not detected in any silage. Tightly packed silages remained stable upon exposure to air. Tight packing increases the digestibly of nutrients and improves the energy content of silages. These data show that high density limits air infiltration and reduces the oxidation loss during storage and feed-out. As a consequence, more dry matter is recovered and more energy is preserved.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRevista Brasileira Zootecnia Brazilian Journal Animal Scienceen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAtıf Gayri Ticari Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararasıtr_TR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAgricultureen_US
dc.subjectVeterinary sciencesen_US
dc.subjectCerealsen_US
dc.subjectNutritional profileen_US
dc.subjectPacking densityen_US
dc.subjectSilageen_US
dc.subjectLactic-acid bacteriaen_US
dc.subjectAerobic deteriorationen_US
dc.subjectDry-matteren_US
dc.subjectCornen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectQualityen_US
dc.titleEffects of ensiling density on nutritive value of maize and sorghum silagesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000386344400003tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84994410091tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Zootekni Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1470-2751tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage596tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage603tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume45tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue10tr_TR
dc.relation.journalRevista Brasileira de Zootecniaita
dc.contributor.buuauthorSucu, Ekin-
dc.contributor.buuauthorCanbolat, Önder-
dc.contributor.buuauthorFilya, İsmail-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-8331-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-2927-2021tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationSanayitr_TR
dc.subject.wosAgriculture, dairy & animal scienceen_US
dc.subject.wosVeterinary sciencesen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.contributor.scopusid14038064900tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7004338636tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6701639395tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusSilage Making; Lactobacillus Buchneri; Lactobacillalesen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sucu_vd_2016.pdf273.17 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons