Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/30717
Title: Routine use of prophylactic antibiotics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not reduce the risk of surgical site infections
Authors: Kılıçturgay, Sadık
Aktaş, Hikmet
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0002-9562-4195
Sarkut, Pınar
Özen, Yılmaz
Kaya, Ekrem
AAG-7319-2021
55806454400
6508243334
7004568109
Keywords: Infectious diseases
Surgery
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Prophylactic antibiotics
Surgical site infection
Postoperative infection
Gallbladder perforation
Prevention
Efficacy
Need
Issue Date: Jun-2017
Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert
Citation: Sarkut, P. vd. (2017). ''Routine use of prophylactic antibiotics during laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not reduce the risk of surgical site infections''. Surgical Infections, 18(5), 603-609.
Abstract: Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is the gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic gallbladder stones. As infections are rare in uncomplicated LC, it is widely accepted that prophylactic antibiotics need not be administered, and guidelines do not support routine antibiotic prophylaxis during elective LC. However, routine antibiotic prophylaxis for elective LC is still popular in many clinical settings. We investigated this situation in our department. Method: This randomized double-blind controlled study included 570 patients who underwent LC between March 2007 and February 2010. The exclusion criteria were antibiotic intake before surgery, steroid treatment, and the presence of pancreatitis, cholangitis, obstructive jaundice, cephalosporin allergy, or pregnancy. The patients were randomized into three groups. Group 1 (n = 193) received physiologic saline as placebo, Group 2 (n = 191) received a first-generation cephalosporin (cefazolin; 1 g), and Group 3 (n = 186) received a second-generation cephalosporin (cefuroksim aksetil; 750mg). Bile and epigastric and umbilical port tissue samples were harvested for culture. All patients were observed until the end of the fourth week after surgery. Patient age, sex, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, history of biliary colic in the past month, length of the hospital stay before the operation, operational findings (acute or chronic cholecystitis), operation duration, use of drainage, type of prophylaxis administered if any, culture results, surgical site infection (SSI) development, and time to SSI development along with associated treatments were evaluated. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups with respect to any of the demographic and clinical features analyzed in this study. The SSI rate was 1.2% in total, and in Groups 1, 2, and 3, it was 1.5%, 1.04%, and 1.07%, respectively. There was no statistical difference regarding SSI among the groups (p = 1.00). Superficial SSI was observed in all groups, and in all patients, the site of infection was the entrance to the epigastric port through which the gallbladder had been removed. Conclusions: Surgical site infection is rare after LC, and antibiotic prophylaxis does not appear to affect the outcome significantly. Moreover, factors such as positive bile cultures, history of biliary attack, ASA score, diabetes, obesity, and smoking do not have any effect on SSI development. Thus, we conclude that antibiotic prophylaxis is not needed for elective LC.
Description: Bu çalışma, 22-24 Kasım 2012 tarihleri arasında İstanbul[Türkiye]’da düzenlenen 16. Annual Meeting of the European-Society-of-Surgery (ESS)’da bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2016.265
https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/sur.2016.265
1557-8674
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/30717
ISSN: 1096-2964
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.