Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31254
Title: | Choosing the appropriate side for subcutaneous port catheter placement in patients with mastectomy: Ipsilateral or contralateral? |
Authors: | Hacıkurt, Kadir Doğan, Nurullah Şanal, Bekir Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı. Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Biyoistatistik Anabilim Dalı. Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı. 0000-0002-8813-6513 0000-0003-0297-846X 0000-0003-1455-6918 Nas, Ömer Fatih Kaya, Ahmet Özkaya, Güven Dündar, Halit Ziya Erdoǧan, Cüneyt AAS-5392-2021 AAG-8561-2021 A-4421-2016 51864050100 56659105900 16316866500 55453773300 8293835700 |
Keywords: | Radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging Breast cancer Contralateral Ipsilateral Society of interventional radiology Subcutaneous port catheter Central venous access Complications Chemotherapy Experience Devices Chest |
Issue Date: | 31-Jan-2017 |
Publisher: | Springer |
Citation: | Nas, Ö. F. vd. (2017). ''Choosing the appropriate side for subcutaneous port catheter placement in patients with mastectomy: Ipsilateral or contralateral?''. Radiologia Medica, 122(6), 472-478. |
Abstract: | To evaluate long-term clinical follow-up results of implanting subcutaneous port catheters (SPCs) on ipsilateral or contralateral with mastectomy side in patients with axillary lymph node dissection. A total of 73 patients composed of ipsilateral (34 catheters) and contralateral (39 catheters) groups, with SPCs were included. All patients had lumpectomy or modified radical mastectomy for breast cancer. Ipsilateral and contralateral groups had similar patient characteristics. Five late complications were seen in the ipsilateral group and 2 late complications in the contralateral group. No statistical significant difference was seen between two groups in regard to late complications. Four complications of the ipsilateral group were classified as major group C and 1 as major group D, while 1 complication of the contralateral group was classified as minor group B and 1 as major group C according to Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) classification. No statistical significant difference was seen between complication rates of two groups in regard to SIR classification. SPC related complications do not differ in regard to ipsilateral or contralateral side selection on mastectomized patients with breast cancer and lymph node dissection. SPCs can be implanted on ipsilateral or contralateral sides of the operation in these patients. |
URI: | https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-017-0736-8 1826-6983 https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11547-017-0736-8 http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31254 |
ISSN: | 0033-8362 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.