Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31758
Title: Antibiotic resistance of Salmonella enteritidis of human and chicken origin
Other Titles: İnsan ve tavuk orijinli Salmonella Enteritidis izolatlarının antibiyotik direnci
Authors: Günaydın, Elçin
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0003-4331-9698
Goncagül, Gülşen
Çarlı, Kamil Tayfun
AAK-6555-2021
8350555500
6601971539
Keywords: Veterinary sciences
Antibiotic resistance
Salmonella enteritidis
Human feces
Chicken intestine
Chicken meat
Antimicrobial resistance
Bacteria (microorganisms)
Gallus gallus
Ilex cookii
Salmonella
Salmonella enterica
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica
Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Enteritidis
Antibiyotik direnci
İnsan dışkısı
Tavuk bağırsağı
Tavuk eti
Issue Date: 2004
Publisher: TÜBİTAK
Citation: Goncagül, G. vd. (2004). “Antibiotic resistance of Salmonella enteritidis of human and chicken origin”. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 28(5), 911-914.
Abstract: The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between antibiotic resistance patterns among Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica Serovar Enteritidis isolates (Salmonella Enteritidis) of human and poultry origin. Antibiotic resistance of 97 Salmonella Enteritidis isolates from 25 chicken meat. 25 chicken intestine and 47 human fecal samples was examined using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS, 1997) disk diffusion method. Resistance patterns of the isolates were as follows: Of the 25 chicken meat isolates 4 were resistant to some antibiotics. Two isolates (CM 15 and CM22) were resistant to ampicillin (AMP), cefuroxime sodium (CXM), ceftriaxone (CRO), trimethoprim-sulphamethazole (SXT) and ampicillin-sulbactam (SAM). Of the other 2 isolates, CM20 showed resistance to ceftriaxone (CRO) and CM23 was resistant to chloromphenicol (C) and cephalexime (CL). Eight human isolates showed 4 different resistance patterns. Five (HF3, HF19, HF20, HF22, and HF25) were resistant to ampicillin (AMP), ampicillin-sulbactam (SAM), tetracycline (TE) and chloromphenicol (C), while resistance to chloromphenicol (C) and cephalexime (CL) was observed in HF32 and HF46. HF13 was resistant to both ampicillin (AMP) and ampicillin-sulbactam (SAM). One of the chicken intestinal isolates was found to be resistant only to cefuroxime sodium (CXM). There was no relationship between antibiotic resistance patterns for Salmonella isolates of different origins. Multiple antibiotic resistance patterns were observed in some isolates. It is important that some isolates of chicken intestine and meat origin showed resistance to antibiotics being used in humans.
URI: https://aj.tubitak.gov.tr/veterinary/issues/vet-04-28-5/vet-28-5-19-0304-5.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31758
ISSN: 1300-0128
Appears in Collections:Scopus
TrDizin
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Goncagül_vd_2004.pdf37 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons