Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/32141
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Çeribaşı, Gökhan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Doğan, Emrah | - |
dc.contributor.author | Akkaya, Uğur | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-04-03T10:17:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-04-03T10:17:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-09-05 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Çeribaşı, G. vd. (2017). ''Application of trend analysis and artificial neural networks methods: The case of Sakarya River''. Scientia Iranica, 24(3), 993-999. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1026-3098 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2017.4082 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://scientiairanica.sharif.edu/article_4082.html | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11452/32141 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Various artificial intelligence techniques are used in order to make prospective estimations with available data. The most common and applied method among these artificial intelligence techniques is Artificial Neural Networks (ANN). On the other hand, another method which is used in order to make prospective estimations with available data is Trend Analysis. When the relation of these two methods is analyzed, Artificial Neural Networks method can present the prospective estimation numerically, while there is no such a case in Trend Analysis. Trend Analysis method presents result of prospective estimation as a decrease or increase in data. Therefore, it is quite important to make a comparison between these methods which brings about prospective estimation with the available data, because these two methods are used in most of these studies. In this study, annual average stream flow and suspended load measured in Sakarya River along with average annual rainfall trend were analyzed with trend analysis method. Daily, weekly, and monthly average stream flows and suspended loads measured in Sakarya River and average daily, weekly, and monthly rainfall data of Sakarya were all analyzed by ANN Model. Results of trend analysis method and ANN model were compared. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sharif University Technology | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights | Atıf Gayri Ticari Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası | tr_TR |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Engineering | en_US |
dc.subject | Trend analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Artificial neural networks | en_US |
dc.subject | Sakarya river | en_US |
dc.subject | Rainfall | en_US |
dc.subject | Stream flow | en_US |
dc.subject | Suspended load | en_US |
dc.subject | Turkey | en_US |
dc.subject | Neural networks | en_US |
dc.subject | Rain | en_US |
dc.subject | Rivers | en_US |
dc.subject | ANN modeling | en_US |
dc.subject | Annual average | en_US |
dc.subject | Annual rainfall | en_US |
dc.subject | Artificial intelligence techniques | en_US |
dc.subject | Monthly rainfalls | en_US |
dc.subject | Artificial intelligence | en_US |
dc.subject | Suspended loads | en_US |
dc.subject | Artificial neural network | en_US |
dc.subject | Data processing | en_US |
dc.title | Application of trend analysis and artificial neural networks methods: The case of Sakarya River | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000405882300011 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85029029402 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Karacabey Meslek Yüksekokulu/Bilgisayar Teknolojisi Bölümü. | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-1172-9465 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | 993 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.endpage | 999 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 24 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.journal | Scientia Iranica | en_US |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Kocamaz, Uğur Erkin | - |
dc.relation.collaboration | Yurt içi | tr_TR |
dc.subject.wos | Engineering, multidisciplinary | en_US |
dc.indexed.wos | SCIE | en_US |
dc.indexed.scopus | Scopus | en_US |
dc.wos.quartile | Q4 | en_US |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 55549566400 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.scopus | China; Penman-Monteith Equation; Trend Analysis | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kocaman_vd_2017.pdf | 2.68 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License