Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/32235
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-06T12:27:11Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-06T12:27:11Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-01-
dc.identifier.citationKaraca, S. vd. (2016). "Comparison of videonystagmography and audiological findings after stapedotomy; CO2 laser vs perforator". Journal of International Advanced Otology, 12(2), 152-155.tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn1308-7649-
dc.identifier.issn2148-3817-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2016.1575-
dc.identifier.urihttps://advancedotology.org//en/comparison-of-videonystagmography-and-audiological-findings-after-stapedotomy-co2-laser-vs-perforator-13925-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/32235-
dc.descriptionBu çalışma, 5-9 Kasım 2014 tarihlerinde Antalya[Türkiye]’düzenlenen 36. Türk Ulusal Kulak Burun Boğaz ve Baş Boyun Cerrahisi Kongresi‘nde bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.tr_TR
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Various types of laser, microdrill, and perforator are effectively used in the surgical treatment of otosclerosis. However, they have certain disadvantages along with advantages. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of carbon dioxide (CO2) laser and perforator stapedotomy techniques on audiological outcomes and postoperative vestibular functions via videonystagmography (VNG). MATERIALS and METHODS: This prospective and randomized clinical study was conducted in an academic tertiary medical center. Sixty-nine patients diagnosed with otosclerosis who underwent stapedotomy were enrolled in this study. Patients were divided into two groups based on the technique used in stapedotomy: CO2 laser and perforator. Postoperative hearing gain and VNG findings were the main outcome measures. Subsequently, the two study groups were compared for analysis. RESULTS: The preoperative air-bone gap was 32.7 +/- 8.9 decibel (dB) in the study population and it was improved to 12.9 +/- 8.4 dB after operation. There were no differences in VNG findings and vertigo symptoms between the laser and perforator groups at postoperative day 2. There was no significant gain difference regarding the air conduction, bone conduction, and air-bone gap between the two groups (p=0.294, p=0.57, and p=0.37, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both CO2 laser and perforator stapedotomy have successful audiological outcomes with no difference in postoperative vestibular disturbance.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAvesen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAtıf Gayri Ticari Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararasıtr_TR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectOtorhinolaryngologyen_US
dc.subjectOtosclerosisen_US
dc.subjectLaser stapedotomyen_US
dc.subjectVertigoen_US
dc.subjectVideonystagmographyen_US
dc.subjectLaser stapedotomyen_US
dc.subjectStapes surgeryen_US
dc.subjectBone-conductionen_US
dc.subjectOtosclerosisen_US
dc.subjectStapedectomyen_US
dc.subjectComplicationsen_US
dc.subjectBalanceen_US
dc.subjectKTPen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshLasers, gasen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.meshOtosclerosisen_US
dc.subject.meshProspective studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshRecovery of functionen_US
dc.subject.meshStapes surgeryen_US
dc.subject.meshTreatment outcomeen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.titleComparison of videonystagmography and audiological findings after stapedotomy; CO2 laser vs perforatoren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000385006000006tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85000956220tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Kulak Burun Boğaz Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9698-0546tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage152tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage155tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume12tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue2tr_TR
dc.relation.journalJournal of International Advanced Otologyen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorKaraca, Sait-
dc.contributor.buuauthorBasut, Oğuz-
dc.contributor.buuauthorDemir, Uygar Levent-
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzmen, Ömer Afşin-
dc.contributor.buuauthorKasapoğlu, Fikret-
dc.contributor.buuauthorCoşkun, Hakan-
dc.contributor.researcheridA-1452-2019tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAI-3877-2021tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed27716600tr_TR
dc.subject.wosOtorhinolaryngologyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ4en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid55088015000tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6602318367tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56868421800tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid55407733900tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56254721200tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid13610800100tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusStapes Surgery; Otosclerosis; Stapedotomyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeConvalescenceen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeGas laseren_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.emtreeOtosclerosisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeProceduresen_US
dc.subject.emtreeProspective studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subject.emtreeStapes surgeryen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTherapeutic useen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTreatment outcomeen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Karaca_vd_2016.pdf1.58 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons