Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/33377
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-07T10:08:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-07T10:08:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-08-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Fung, S. vd. (2017). ''Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs. emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF in lamivudine resistant hepatitis B: A 5-year randomised study''. Journal of Hepatology, 66(1), 11-18. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0168-8278 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1600-0641 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2016.08.008 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168827816304408 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11452/33377 | - |
dc.description | Çalışmada 22 yazar bulunmaktadır. Bu yazarlardan sadece Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi mensuplarının girişleri yapılmıştır. | tr_TR |
dc.description.abstract | Background & Aims: Long-term treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) alone, or in combination with emtricitabine (FTC) is associated with sustained viral suppression in patients with lamivudine resistant (LAM-R) chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Methods: LAM-R CHB patients were randomised 1:1 to receive TDF 300 mg or FTC 200 mg and TDF 300 mg once daily in a prospective, double blind, study. The proportion of patients with plasma hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA <69 IU/m1 (<400 copies/ml) at week 96 (primary efficacy endpoint) was reported previously. Here we present week 240 follow-up data. Results: Overall, 280 patients were randomised to receive TDF (n = 141) or FTC/TDF (n = 139), and 85.4% completed 240 weeks of treatment. At week 240, 83.0% of patients in the TDF arm, and 82.7% of patients in the FTC/TDF treatment arm had HBV DNA <69 IU/ml (p = 0.96). Rates of normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and normalised ALT were similar between groups (p = 0.41 and p = 0.97 respectively). Hepatitis B e antigen loss and seroconversion at week 240 were similar between groups, (p = 0.41 and p = 0.67 respectively). Overall, six patients achieved hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss and one patient (FTC/TDF arm) had HBsAg seroconversion by week 240. No TDF resistance was observed up to week 240. Treatment was generally well tolerated, and renal events were mild and infrequent (similar to 8.6%). The mean change in bone mineral density at week 240 was -0.98% and -2.54% at the spine and hip, respectively. Conclusions: TDF monotherapy was effective and well tolerated in LAM-R CHB patients for up to 240 weeks. Lay summary: The goal of oral antiviral treatment for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is to achieve and maintain undetectable HBV DNA levels. Treatment options with enhanced potency, and low risk of resistance development for patients infected with lamivudine resistant (LAM-R) HBV are required. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) monotherapy was effective and well tolerated without TDF resistance development in CHB patients with LAM-R, for up to 240 weeks. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | Elements Communications Ltd, Westerham, UK | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights | Atıf Gayri Ticari Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası | tr_TR |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Gastroenterology & hepatology | en_US |
dc.subject | Emtricitabine | en_US |
dc.subject | Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate | en_US |
dc.subject | Viral suppression | en_US |
dc.subject | Bone mineral density | en_US |
dc.subject | Renal function | en_US |
dc.subject | Long-term efficacy | en_US |
dc.subject | Virus infection | en_US |
dc.subject | Combination therapy | en_US |
dc.subject | Adefovirentecavir | en_US |
dc.subject | Safety | en_US |
dc.subject | Monotherapy | en_US |
dc.subject | Cirrhosis | en_US |
dc.subject | Level | en_US |
dc.subject | Risk | en_US |
dc.subject | Lamivudine resistant | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Antiviral agents | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | DNA, viral | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Double-blind method | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Drug monitoring; drug resistance, viral | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Drug therapy, combination | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Emtricitabine | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Hepatitis B e antigens | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Hepatitis B surface antigens | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Hepatitis B virus | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Hepatitis B, chronic | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Tenofovir | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment outcome | en_US |
dc.title | Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) vs. emtricitabine (FTC)/TDF in lamivudine resistant hepatitis B: A 5-year randomised study | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000390642900003 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85000692609 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/İç Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı. | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | 11 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.endpage | 18 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 66 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.journal | Journal of Hepatology | en_US |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Gürel, Selim | - |
dc.contributor.researcherid | HLH-8209-2023 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.collaboration | Yurt içi | tr_TR |
dc.relation.collaboration | Yurt dışı | tr_TR |
dc.relation.collaboration | Sanayi | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 27545497 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.wos | Gastroenterology & hepatology | en_US |
dc.indexed.wos | SCIE | en_US |
dc.indexed.scopus | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indexed.pubmed | PubMed | en_US |
dc.wos.quartile | Q1 | en_US |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 7003706434 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.scopus | Hepatitis B E Antigen; Entecavir; Liver Cell Carcinoma | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Alanine aminotransferase | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Emtricitabine | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Hemoglobin | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Hepatitis B surface antigen | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Hepatitis B(e) antigen | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Lamivudine | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Placebo | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Tenofovir disoproxil | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Antivirus agent | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Emtricitabine | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Hepatitis B surface antigen | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Hepatitis B(e) antigen | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Tenofovir | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Virus DNA | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Antiviral therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Arthralgia | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Article | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Bladder cancer | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Bone density | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Chronic hepatitis B | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Controlled study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Creatinine clearance | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Disease association | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Double blind procedure | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug efficacy | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug safety | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug tolerability | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug withdrawal | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Fatigue | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Follow up | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Gastrointestinal hemorrhage | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Headache | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Heart arrest | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Hepatitis B virus | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Hip | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Human | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Kidney disease | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Liver cell carcinoma | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Long term care | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Major clinical study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Middle aged | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Multicenter study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Multiple trauma | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Osteopenia | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Osteoporosis | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Pancreas cancer | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Pneumonia | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Priority journal | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Prospective study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Randomized controlled trial | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Rhinopharyngitis | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Seroconversion | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Spine | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Treatment duration | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Treatment response | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Virus resistance | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Antiviral resistance | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Blood | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Chronic hepatitis B | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Combination drug therapy | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug effects | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Drug monitoring | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Hepatitis B virus | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Isolation and purification | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Physiology | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Procedures | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Treatment outcome | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Virology | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Virus load | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Gürel_vd_2017.pdf | 824.98 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License