Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/33763
Title: Can we improve pressure feedback methods in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials by applying custom pressures?
Authors: Özmen, Suay
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Kulak Burun Boğaz Anabilim Dalı.
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Fizyoloji Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0002-9698-0546
Özmen, Ömer Afşin
Özlük, Kasım
Basut, Oğuz
AAL-1898-2020
A-1452-2019
55407733900
6602676331
6602318367
Keywords: Otorhinolaryngology
Cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential
Vestibular function tests
Saccule
Age-related-changes
Sternocleidomastoid muscle
Normalization
Reliability
Epithelia
Reflexes
Nerve
Level
Issue Date: 31-Mar-2017
Publisher: Aves
Citation: Özmen, Ö. A. vd. (2017). ''Can we improve pressure feedback methods in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials by applying custom pressures?''. Journal of International Advanced Otology, 13(2), 247-253.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to use constant and customized pressure levels to improve the feedback method of the blood pressure cuff technique in order to decrease intra-subject and inter-subject variability. MATERIALS and METHODS: The study was conducted in two stages. In the first stage, the relationship between the pressure level generated in the blood pressure cuff and electromyographic response in the sternocleidomastoid (SCM) muscle was investigated. In the second stage, vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) measurements were made using a custom-built VEMP chair at a constant pressure level of 40 mmHg (P-40) or at 50% of the maximum pressure (P-max50%) that could be generated by the SCM muscle. RESULTS: VEMP measurements were performed on 100 volunteers consisting of 48 males and 52 females whose ages were between 20 and 68 years. The response rate was 41% on a subject basis and 53% on an ear basis. Response rates were similar in males and females, and they decreased with age. The response rate was significantly lower in 11% of the volunteers who could not generate the stipulated 80 mmHg pressure level. Response rates obtained with P-40 and P-max50% were similar, and p13 and n23 latencies and p13-n23 amplitudes obtained from both sides were also similar. Amplitudes were higher in P-max50% measurements compared to P-40, and amplitudes obtained with P-40 levels showed greater variance compared to P-max50%. CONCLUSION: The use of P-max50% provided reduced variation compared to P-40; however, it did not have significant clinical implications. Further studies are needed for the control of many factors that are related to amplitude variability.
URI: https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2017.2774
https://advancedotology.org//en/can-we-improve-pressure-feedback-methods-in-vestibular-evoked-myogenic-potentials-by-applying-custom-pressures-131076%5C
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/33763
ISSN: 1308-7649
2148-3817
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Özmen_vd_2017.pdf1.7 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons