Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34417
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-18T07:43:06Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-18T07:43:06Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-
dc.identifier.citationÇakmak G. K. vd. 2020). "Surgical trends in breast cancer in Turkey: An increase in breast-conserving surgery".Journal of Global Oncology, 6, 285-292.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2687-8941-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1200/JGO.19.00275-
dc.identifier.urihttps://ascopubs.org/doi/pdf/10.1200/JGO.19.00275?role=tab-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/34417-
dc.descriptionBu çalışmada 25 yazar bulunmaktadır. Bu yazarlardan sadece Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi mensuplarının girişleri yapılmıştır.tr_TR
dc.description.abstractPURPOSEBreast cancer is the most frequent cancer in women, and there is a great variability in surgical practice for treating that cancer in different countries. The aims of this study were to analyze the effect of guidelines from the Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Societies on academic institutions that have breast centers and to evaluate surgical practice in Turkey in 2018.PATIENTS AND METHODSBetween January and March 2019, a survey was sent to breast surgeons who were working in breast centers in academic institutions. The sampling frame included 24 academic institutions with breast centers in 18 cities in Turkey to evaluate interdisciplinary differences among breast centers and seven regions in Turkey regarding patients' choices, surgical approaches, and academic institutions.RESULTSAll surgeons responded to the survey, and all 4,381 patients were included. Most of the surgeons (73.9%) were working in a breast center. Multidisciplinary tumor boards were performed in 87% of the breast centers. The average time between clinical evaluation and initiation of treatment was 29 days; the longest time was in Southeast Anatolia (66 days). Only 6% of patients had ductal carcinoma in situ. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was available in every region across the country and was performed in 64.5% of the patients. In 2018, the overall breast-conserving surgery rate was 57.3% in Turkey, and it varied from 72.2% in the Black Sea region to 33.5% in Central Anatolia (P < .001). Oncoplastic breast surgery options were available at all breast centers. However, 25% of the breast centers from the Black Sea region and half the breast centers from Eastern Anatolia and the Mediterranean region did not perform this type of surgery.CONCLUSIONIncreasing rates of nonpalpable breast cancer and decreasing rates of locoregional recurrences favored breast-conserving surgery, especially in developed countries. Guidelines from the Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Societies resulted in more comprehensive breast centers and improved breast health in Turkey.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherLippincott Williams & Wilkinsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAtıf Gayri Ticari Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararasıtr_TR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectOncologyen_US
dc.subjectGeographic-variationen_US
dc.subjectSentinel nodeen_US
dc.subjectMastectomyen_US
dc.subjectWomenen_US
dc.subject.meshBlack Seaen_US
dc.subject.meshBreast neoplasmsen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMastectomy, segmentalen_US
dc.subject.meshNeoplasm recurrence, localen_US
dc.subject.meshTurkeyen_US
dc.titleSurgical trends in breast cancer in Turkey: An increase in breast-conserving surgeryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000524896400013tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85082945167tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage285tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage292tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume6tr_TR
dc.relation.journalJournal of Global Oncologyen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorGökgöz, Şehsuvar-
dc.contributor.researcheridEXK-4525-2022tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içitr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationSanayitr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed32109157tr_TR
dc.subject.wosOncologyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.contributor.scopusid6603238737tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusSegmental mastectomy; Breast neoplasms; Fat necrosisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeAgeden_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBreast canceren_US
dc.subject.emtreeCancer surgeryen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeIntraductal carcinomaen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreePartial mastectomyen_US
dc.subject.emtreePriority journalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSentinel lymph node biopsyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTrend studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTurkey (republic)en_US
dc.subject.emtreeBlack seaen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBreast tumoren_US
dc.subject.emtreeTumor recurrenceen_US
dc.subject.emtreeTurkey (bird)en_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gökgöz_vd_2020.pdf559.18 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons