Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34521
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBalcıoğlu, Harun-
dc.contributor.authorVatansever, Kevser-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-23T11:06:24Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-23T11:06:24Z-
dc.date.issued2016-06-
dc.identifier.citationCivaner, M. M. vd. (2016). "Medical students' opinions about the commercialization of healthcare: A cross-sectional survey". Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 13(2), 261-270.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1176-7529-
dc.identifier.issn1872-4353-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-016-9704-6-
dc.identifier.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11673-016-9704-6-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/34521-
dc.description.abstractThere are serious concerns about the commercialization of healthcare and adoption of the business approach in medicine. As market dynamics endanger established professional values, healthcare workers face more complicated ethical dilemmas in their daily practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the willingness of medical students to accept the assertions of commercialized healthcare and the factors affecting their level of agreement, factors which could influence their moral stance when market demands conflict with professional values. A cross-sectional study was conducted in three medical schools in Turkey. The study population consisted of first-, third-, and sixth-year students, and 1,781 students participated in total. Students were asked to state if they agreed with the assertions of commercialized healthcare. Of all students, 87.2 per cent agreed with at least one of the assertions, and one-fifth (20.8 per cent) of them agreed with more than half of the assertions. First-year students significantly agreed more with some assertions than third- and sixth-year students. Being female, having mid-level family income, choosing medicine due to idealistic reasons, and being in the third or sixth years of medical study increased the probability of disagreement. Also, studying in a medical school that included integrated lectures on health policies, rights related to health, and health inequities, along with early field visits, increased the probability of disagreement. This study suggests that agreement with the assertions of commercialized healthcare might be prevalent among students at a considerable level. We argue that this level of agreement is not compatible with best practice in professional ethics and indicates the need for an educational intervention in order to have physicians who give priority to patients' best interests in the face of market demands.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSocial sciences - other topicsen_US
dc.subjectMedical ethicsen_US
dc.subjectSocial issuesen_US
dc.subjectBiomedical social sciencesen_US
dc.subjectCommercializationen_US
dc.subjectPrivatizationen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectProfessionalismen_US
dc.subjectMedical educationen_US
dc.subjectProfessional ethicsen_US
dc.subjectWorld-banken_US
dc.subjectPrivatisationen_US
dc.subjectServicesen_US
dc.subjectPrivatizationen_US
dc.subjectProfessionalismen_US
dc.subjectHospitalsen_US
dc.subjectCountriesen_US
dc.subjectPrivateen_US
dc.subjectReformsen_US
dc.subjectAccessen_US
dc.subject.meshAttitude of health personnelen_US
dc.subject.meshCareer choiceen_US
dc.subject.meshCross-sectional studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshDelivery of health careen_US
dc.subject.meshEthics, medicalen_US
dc.subject.meshEthics, professionalen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMarketing of health servicesen_US
dc.subject.meshSchools, medicalen_US
dc.subject.meshStudents, medicalen_US
dc.titleMedical students' opinions about the commercialization of healthcare: A cross-sectional surveyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000379016800011tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84961572838tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Tıp Etiği Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-5376-3499tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage261tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage270tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume13tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue2tr_TR
dc.relation.journalJournal of Bioethical Inquiryen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorCivaner, M. Murat-
dc.contributor.researcheridS-4188-2019tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationYurt içitr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed26781432tr_TR
dc.subject.wosEthicsen_US
dc.subject.wosMedical ethicsen_US
dc.subject.wosSocial issuesen_US
dc.subject.wosSocial sciences, biomedicalen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.wosSSCIen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ3 (Ethics)en_US
dc.wos.quartileQ3 (Social issues)en_US
dc.wos.quartileQ4 (Medical ethics)en_US
dc.wos.quartileQ4 (Social sciences, biomedical)en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid24075622600en_US
dc.subject.scopusFiji; Universal Health Care; Decision Spaceen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCross-sectional studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDecision makingen_US
dc.subject.emtreeEthicsen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFinancial managementen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHealth care deliveryen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHealth personnel attitudeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMedical ethicsen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMedical schoolen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMedical studenten_US
dc.subject.emtreePsychologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeStandardsen_US
Appears in Collections:PubMed
Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.