Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34645
Title: | Should nasal function be considered prior to tympanoplasty? |
Authors: | Akyıldız, Metin Yüksel Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Kulak Burun Boğaz Anabilim Dalı. Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Biyoistatistik Anabilim Dalı. 0000-0002-9698-0546 Özmen, Ömer Afşin Demir, Uygar Levent Kasapoǧlu, Fikret Çoşkun, Hakan Hamdi Basut, Oǧuz İbrahim Sığırlı, Deniz A-1452-2019 AAI-3877-2021 AAA-7472-2021 55407733900 56868421800 56254721200 13610800100 6602318367 24482063400 |
Keywords: | Otorhinolaryngology Nasal septum Nasal airway obstruction Eustachian tube Tympanoplasty Eustachian-tube function Middle-ear pressure Recurrent otitis-media Obstruction Effusion Surgery |
Issue Date: | 4-Sep-2017 |
Publisher: | Aves |
Citation: | Akyıldız, M. Y. vd. (2018). ''Should nasal function be considered prior to tympanoplasty?''. Journal of International Advanced Otology, 14(1), 53-57. |
Abstract: | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between nasal airway function and Eustachian tube (ET) functions and their impact on tympanoplasty in patients with chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM). MATERIALS and METHODS: The study group (CSOM group) consisted of 33 patients scheduled to undergo tympanoplasty for CSOM. Two control groups were formed: a nasal septal deviation (NSD) group of 25 patients scheduled to undergo nasal surgery for NSD, and a control group of 25 healthy individuals with no otologic or rhinologic symptoms. ET functions were assessed tympanometrically with automatic Williams test (ETF1) and modified pressure equalization inflation-deflation test (ETF2) and nasal functions were analyzed using acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry. The patients in the CSOM group underwent tympanoplasty, and tests were repeated at the end of the 3rd postoperative month. RESULTS: Both acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry revealed similar nasal function in the CSOM and NSD groups, which was inferior to that of the control group. The CSOM group had the worst ET function. Dysfunctional ETs in the CSOM group improved at 3 months postsurgery, and all groups had a similar outcome regarding ET functions. The outcome of ear surgery was not affected by nasal function, and the graft take rate was 90%. CONCLUSION: Patients with NSD had generally poor ET function; however, this did not affect the outcomes of tympanoplasty. The preoperative ET function results were inconsistent with the results following tympanoplasty; therefore, they were not predictive of need for septoplasty. Thus, we do not universally recommend surgical correction of NSD prior to ear surgery; however, this decision should be made on an individual basis. |
URI: | https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2017.3624 https://advancedotology.org//en/should-nasal-function-be-considered-prior-to-tympanoplasty-131178%5C http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34645 |
ISSN: | 1308-7649 2148-3817 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Özmen_vd_2018.pdf | 1.88 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License