Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34772
Title: Safety and efficacy of regorafenib in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in Turkey: The single-arm, open-label regard study
Authors: Dane, Faysal
Özgürdal, Kırhan
Yalçın, Şuayib
Benekli, Mustafa
Aykan, Nuri Faruk
Yücel, İdris
Özkan, Metin
Sevinç, Alper
Coşkun, Hasan Şenol
Şanlı, Ulus Ali
Kara, İsmail Oğuz
Yumuk, Perran Fulden
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Tıbbi Onkoloji Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0002-9732-5340
Evrensel, Türkkan
AAJ-1027-2021
6603942124
Keywords: General & internal medicine
Multicenter
Tumors
Issue Date: Mar-2020
Publisher: BMJ Publishing Group
Citation: Dane, F. vd. (2020). "Safety and efficacy of regorafenib in patients with treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in Turkey: The single-arm, open-label regard study". BMJ Open, 10(3).
Abstract: Objectives Regorafenib improved overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard therapies in two randomised, phase III trials, but has not been evaluated in Turkey. REGARD evaluated the safety and efficacy of regorafenib in Turkish patients with treatment-refractory mCRC. Design Open-label, single-arm, phase IIIb study conducted between July 2013 and April 2015. Setting 11 tertiary centres in Turkey. Participants Eligible patients were adults with mCRC who had disease progression within 3 months after receiving their last dose of approved standard therapies and who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <= 1. Patients were excluded if they had previously received regorafenib. Of 139 patients screened, 100 were treated and completed the study, and all 100 were analysed. Fifty-eight per cent were male. Interventions Patients received oral regorafenib, 160 mg once daily, for the first 3 weeks of each 4-week cycle until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. Primary and secondary outcome measures The primary endpoint was safety, assessed by incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Progression-free survival (PFS) per investigator was the primary efficacy endpoint. There were no secondary endpoints. Results The median treatment duration was 2.5 months (range 0.1 to 20.6). Ninety-six per cent of patients had at least one TEAE and 77% had a grade >= 3 TEAE. The most common grade >= 3 regorafenib-related TEAEs were hypophosphataemia (11%), fatigue (8%), hyperbilirubinaemia (6%), hand-foot skin reaction (5%), hypertension (5%), anorexia (5%) and increased alanine aminotransferase (5%). TEAEs led to dose reduction in 30% of patients. Regorafenib-related TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 17% of patients. Median PFS was 3.1 months (95% CI 2.9 to 3.8). Conclusion The regorafenib safety profile and PFS in REGARD were consistent with the results of previous trials of regorafenib in mCRC. Regorafenib is an option for patients in Turkey with treatment-refractory mCRC.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027665
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/bmjopen/10/3/e027665.full.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/34772
ISSN: 2044-6055
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Evrensel_vd_2020.pdf461.73 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons