Bu öğeden alıntı yapmak, öğeye bağlanmak için bu tanımlayıcıyı kullanınız:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/14551
Başlık: | Detection of shiga-toxin producing e.coli (stec), enteropathogenic e.coli (epec) and enterotoxigenic e.coli (etec) from animals by m-pcr |
Yazarlar: | Khider, Mohammed Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Veteriner Fakültesi. Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. 0000-0003-4337-577X 0000-0002-9212-8743 0000-0001-7601-7640 0000-0001-9018-1842 Büyükcangaz, Esra Sen, Aysin Cengiz, Murat Sonal, Songül |
Anahtar kelimeler: | Antimicrobial susceptibility E. coli STEC PCR EPEC ETEC |
Yayın Tarihi: | 10-Kas-2019 |
Yayıncı: | Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi |
Atıf: | Büyükcangaz, E. vd. (2019). "Detection of shiga-toxin producing e.coli (stec), enteropathogenic e.coli (epec) and enterotoxigenic e.coli (etec) from animals by m-pcr". Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi, 38(2), 88-94. |
Özet: | This research investigated the presence of virulence genes encoding F41, K99, eae, Stx1, Stx2 and STa and the antimicrobial resistance of animal Escherichia coli (E. coli) isolates. Clinical isolates (n:233) were evaluated from fecal samples of cattle, sheep, goats, horses, cats and dogs collected between the years of 2010 to 2015 from Turkey. Enterohaemorrahic E.coli (EHEC) O157:H7 was detected by using cefixime tellurite sorbitol MacConkey agar (CT-SMAC) and Wellcollex E. coli (Remel®). The Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion test was performed to detect the resistance pattern of the isolates to ampicillin, Amoxycilin/clavulanic acid, enrofloxacin, ceftiofur, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and tetracycline. The results showed that 40% of the ruminant isolates were identified as Shiga-toxin producing Escherichia coli (STEC). Enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC) was detected in samples from cattle (0.9%) and sheep (12%). Enteropathogenic E.coli (EPEC) was detected in samples from cattle (0.9%) and dogs (11.4%). EHEC O157:H7 was not detected any of the isolate. Among all E.coli isolates that carried at least one virulence gene, 8 (19%) were resistant to more than three antimicrobials, 7 (16.7%) were resistant to at least one antimicrobial and 27 (64.3%) were susceptible to all antimicrobials. |
URI: | https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/891633 http://hdl.handle.net/11452/14551 |
ISSN: | 1301-3173 |
Koleksiyonlarda Görünür: | 2019 Cilt 38 Sayı 2 |
Bu öğenin dosyaları:
Dosya | Açıklama | Boyut | Biçim | |
---|---|---|---|---|
38_2_12.pdf | 390.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Göster/Aç |
Bu öğe kapsamında lisanslı Creative Commons License