Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/20990
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-02T10:17:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-07-02T10:17:44Z-
dc.date.issued2004-05-10-
dc.identifier.citationGöksoy, A.T. vd. (2004). “Responses of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) to full and limited irrigation at different growth stages”. Field Crops Research, 87(2-3), 167-178.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0378-4290-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2003.11.004-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429003002454-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/20990-
dc.description.abstractThis study was carried out to understand the relationships between yield and irrigation water applied at different growth periods and to determine the most critical period(s) for sunflower. A rainfed (non-irrigated) treatment as the control and 13 different irrigation treatments (H, F, M, HF, HM, FM, HFM, H60FM, H40FM, HF60M, HF40M, HFM60, HFM40) With full (about 360 min) or limited (40 and 60%) irrigation water, were applied to the hybrid Sanbro (Novartis Seed Company) planted on clay soil, at three critical development periods: heading (H), flowering (F), and milking (M). Evapotranspiration (ET) increased as an increasing amount of irrigation water was applied. The highest seasonal ET (an average of 674 mm) was measured in the HFM treatment. Limited irrigation applied at different at-owing periods had different effects on the yield-related characters examined. The highest seed yield (4056 kg ha(-1)) and oil yield (1841 kg ha(-1)) were obtained from the HFM treatment; 85.4 and 88% increases, respectively, compared with the control. The seed yield and oil yield increases for the limited-irrigation treatments were: 78.7 and 77.4% for H60FM; 77.4 and 78.9% for H40FM; 72.2 and 75% for HF60M; 76.4 and 79.2% for HF40M; 72.7 and 73.6% for HFM60; 77.6 and 79.1% for HFM40. Therefore, we confirm that HFM irrigation is the best choice for maximum yield under the local conditions, but these irrigation schemes must be re-considered in areas where water resources are more limited. In case of more restricted irrigation, the limitation of irrigation water at the flowering period should be avoided.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSunfloweren_US
dc.subjectIrrigationen_US
dc.subjectWater deficiten_US
dc.subjectEvapotranspirationen_US
dc.subjectGrowth periodsen_US
dc.subjectYielden_US
dc.subjectYield componentsen_US
dc.subjectOil contenten_US
dc.subjectWateren_US
dc.subjectDateen_US
dc.subjectPopulationen_US
dc.subjectStrategiesen_US
dc.subjectAgricultureen_US
dc.titleResponses of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) to full and limited irrigation at different growth stagesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000220837900005tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-1842638144tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0012-4412tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage167tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage178tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume87tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue2-3tr_TR
dc.relation.journalField Crops Researchen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorGöksoy, Abdurrahim Tanju-
dc.contributor.buuauthorDemir, Ali Osman-
dc.contributor.buuauthorTuran, Z. Metin-
dc.contributor.buuauthorDağüstü, Nazan-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-9296-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-1582-2021tr_TR
dc.subject.wosAgronomyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.wos.quartileQ2en_US
Appears in Collections:Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.