Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/20990
Title: Responses of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) to full and limited irrigation at different growth stages
Authors: Uludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Tarla Bitkileri Bölümü.
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Tarımsal Yapılar ve Sulama Bölümü.
0000-0002-0012-4412
Göksoy, Abdurrahim Tanju
Demir, Ali Osman
Turan, Z. Metin
Dağüstü, Nazan
AAG-9296-2021
AAH-1582-2021
Keywords: Sunflower
Irrigation
Water deficit
Evapotranspiration
Growth periods
Yield
Yield components
Oil content
Water
Date
Population
Strategies
Agriculture
Issue Date: 10-May-2004
Publisher: Elsevier
Citation: Göksoy, A.T. vd. (2004). “Responses of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) to full and limited irrigation at different growth stages”. Field Crops Research, 87(2-3), 167-178.
Abstract: This study was carried out to understand the relationships between yield and irrigation water applied at different growth periods and to determine the most critical period(s) for sunflower. A rainfed (non-irrigated) treatment as the control and 13 different irrigation treatments (H, F, M, HF, HM, FM, HFM, H60FM, H40FM, HF60M, HF40M, HFM60, HFM40) With full (about 360 min) or limited (40 and 60%) irrigation water, were applied to the hybrid Sanbro (Novartis Seed Company) planted on clay soil, at three critical development periods: heading (H), flowering (F), and milking (M). Evapotranspiration (ET) increased as an increasing amount of irrigation water was applied. The highest seasonal ET (an average of 674 mm) was measured in the HFM treatment. Limited irrigation applied at different at-owing periods had different effects on the yield-related characters examined. The highest seed yield (4056 kg ha(-1)) and oil yield (1841 kg ha(-1)) were obtained from the HFM treatment; 85.4 and 88% increases, respectively, compared with the control. The seed yield and oil yield increases for the limited-irrigation treatments were: 78.7 and 77.4% for H60FM; 77.4 and 78.9% for H40FM; 72.2 and 75% for HF60M; 76.4 and 79.2% for HF40M; 72.7 and 73.6% for HFM60; 77.6 and 79.1% for HFM40. Therefore, we confirm that HFM irrigation is the best choice for maximum yield under the local conditions, but these irrigation schemes must be re-considered in areas where water resources are more limited. In case of more restricted irrigation, the limitation of irrigation water at the flowering period should be avoided.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2003.11.004
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378429003002454
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/20990
ISSN: 0378-4290
Appears in Collections:Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.