Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/23862
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-05T08:58:55Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-05T08:58:55Z-
dc.date.issued2011-04-23-
dc.identifier.citationBüyükcangaz, E. vd. (2011). ''Comparison of direct culture versus PCR for the detection of Brucella in aborted fetuses of cattle and sheep in Turkey". Veterinary Record, 168(16), 430.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0042-4900-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/vr.c7003-
dc.identifier.urihttps://bvajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1136/vr.c7003-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/23862-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to detect Brucella in samples from aborted fetuses of sheep and cattle in Turkey using PCR and bacteriological analysis, and to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the PCR. Organ homogenates from 38 aborted fetuses of cattle and 56 aborted fetuses of sheep were tested. All organ homogenates were cultured for bacteriological analysis, and all of the homogenates and the Brucella isolates obtained by culture were examined with a commercial PCR kit. On bacteriological analysis, Brucella species were found in 30 (31.9 per cent) of the 94 organ homogenates, eight (21.1 per cent) of which were from cattle and 22 (39.3 per cent) from sheep. Using PCR, a total of 29 (30.9 per cent) homogenates were positive for Brucella species, eight (21.1 per cent) of which were from cattle and 21 (37.5 per cent) from sheep. Compared with the bacteriological method, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the PCR kit used in this study were 83 per cent and 94 per cent, respectively.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectVeterinary sciencesen_US
dc.subjectReal-time PCRen_US
dc.subjectVaccine strainsen_US
dc.subjectEnrichment stepen_US
dc.subjectStomach contenten_US
dc.subjectStomach contenten_US
dc.subjectChain-reactionen_US
dc.subjectMelitensisen_US
dc.subjectAssayen_US
dc.subjectDifferentiationen_US
dc.subjectMilken_US
dc.subjectDNAen_US
dc.subjectBosen_US
dc.subjectBrucellaen_US
dc.subjectOvis ariesen_US
dc.subject.meshAborted fetusen_US
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_US
dc.subject.meshBrucellaen_US
dc.subject.meshBrucellosisen_US
dc.subject.meshBrucellosis, bovineen_US
dc.subject.meshCattleen_US
dc.subject.meshColony count, microbialen_US
dc.subject.meshPolymerase chain reactionen_US
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of resultsen_US
dc.subject.meshSensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subject.meshSheepen_US
dc.subject.meshSheep diseasesen_US
dc.subject.meshSpecies specificityen_US
dc.subject.meshTurkeyen_US
dc.titleComparison of direct culture versus PCR for the detection of Brucella in aborted fetuses of cattle and sheep in Turkeyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000290458000017tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-79956081323tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Veteriner Fakültesi/Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.relation.bapV-2006/26tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-4337-577Xtr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9212-8743tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage430tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume168tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue16tr_TR
dc.relation.journalVeterinary Recorden_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorBüyükcangaz, Esra K.-
dc.contributor.buuauthorŞen, Ayşin-
dc.contributor.buuauthorÇarli, Kamil Tayfun-
dc.contributor.buuauthorKahya, Serpil-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAL-2323-2020tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-1820-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-2842-2021tr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed21493448tr_TR
dc.subject.wosVeterinary sciencesen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubmeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ2en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid25649139400tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid7401592869tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6601971539tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid35368679200tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusBrucellosis; Complement Fixation Tests; Seroprevalenceen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAnimalen_US
dc.subject.emtreeAnimal diseaseen_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBacterial counten_US
dc.subject.emtreeBrucellaen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBrucellosisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCattleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeComparative studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDisease transmissionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFetus deathen_US
dc.subject.emtreeIsolation and purificationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMethodologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMicrobiologyen_US
dc.subject.emtreePolymerase chain reactionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeReproducibilityen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSheepen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSheep diseaseen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSpecies differenceen_US
dc.subject.emtreeStandarden_US
dc.subject.emtreeTurkey (republic)en_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.