Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/23873
Title: The beneficial effects of preperitoneal catheter analgesia following colon and rectal resections: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Authors: Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı.
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı.
Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Akciğer Bilimleri Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0002-9541-5035
0000-0003-3604-8826
Öztürk, Ersin
Yılmazlar, Aysun
Coşkun, Funda
Işık, Özgen
Yılmazlar, Tuncay
P-5779-2019
AAD-1271-2019
35070171400
55899579900
21734137500
36600543700
6701800362
Keywords: Gastroenterology & hepatology
Surgery
Preperitoneal
Catheter
Analgesia
Local anesthetic
Continuous wound infusion
Postoperative pain
Colorectal surgery
Bupivacaine
Perfusion
Relief
Hysterectomy
Recovery
Efficacy
System
Issue Date: Sep-2011
Publisher: Springer
Citation: Öztürk, E. vd. (2011). ''The beneficial effects of preperitoneal catheter analgesia following colon and rectal resections: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study''. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 15(3), 331-336.
Abstract: Preperitoneal catheter analgesia following abdominal surgery has attracted interest in the last decade. We conducted this study to evaluate the benefits of preperitoneal catheter analgesia in managing pain after abdominal colon and rectal resections. A total of 50 patients undergoing colon and rectal resections for benign and malignant diseases received analgesic medicines via an epidural catheter placed just prior to surgery and a preperitoneal catheter placed at the end of the surgical procedure. Patients were instructed to use the epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) device freely and were randomized into two groups after obtaining the approval of the Institutional Review Board: Group A received 10 ml of levobupivacaine twice a day postoperatively via preperitoneal catheter and group B received only 10 ml of saline. Demographics, surgical characteristics, pain scores recorded four days following surgery, analgesic volume used from the epidural PCA, clinical outcomes (length of stay, time to first bowel movement, time to first passage of gas or stool, time to first oral intake) and respiratory function test results (preoperative vs. postoperative) were compared. There were no significant differences in demographics or surgical characteristics between both groups. Pain scores were similar. Clinical outcomes and respiratory functions were comparable. The use of analgesic volume via epidural catheter was significantly lower in group A than in group B (P = 0.032). Preperitoneal catheter analgesia significantly decreased the need for epidural drug consumption and proved to be a beneficial adjunct for postoperative pain management of patients who underwent colon and rectal resections.
Description: Bu çalışma, 09-13 Eylül 2009 tarihleri arasında Salzburg[Avusturya]’da düzenlenen 28. Annual European-Society-of-Regional-Anaesthesia Congress’da bildiri olarak sunulmuştur.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-011-0720-6
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21769617/
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/23873
ISSN: 1123-6337
1128-045X
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.