Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/23912
Title: | The use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with common variable immunodeficiency |
Authors: | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Pediatri Anabilim Dalı. 0000-0003-0710-5422 0000-0001-8571-2581 Karalı, Yasin Sağlam, Halil Karalı, Zuhal Kılıç, Sara Şebnem C-7392-2019 AAH-1658-2021 49863694000 35612700100 35791967200 34975059200 |
Keywords: | Allergy Immunology Complementary and alternative medicine Common variable immunodeficiency Immunodeficiency Turkish cancer-patients Pediatric-patients Eastern Turkey Children Therapies Prevalence Asthma |
Issue Date: | 2011 |
Publisher: | Esmon Publicidad |
Citation: | Karalı, Y. vd. (2011). "The use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with common variable immunodeficiency". Journal of Investigational Allergology and Clinical Immunology, 21(6), 480-483. |
Abstract: | Objectives: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) usage is a reality in patients with chronic diseases, but there are no data on CAM usage in immunodeficiency diseases necessitating intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of CAM usage in patients with common variable immunodeficiency (CVID). Methods: Forty-three patients (29 boys and 14 girls) with CVID and receiving IVIG every 3 weeks were included. Data were collected through a questionnaire completed by the parents. Those using treatments other than their medical therapies that were defined as CAM by the National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine were classified as CAM users. Results: The mean (SD) age at diagnosis was 7.56 (9.44) years (range, 6 months to 44 years) and the mean IVIG treatment duration was 6.02 (3.84) years (range, 1 to 20 years). Thirty-six (83.7%) of the 43 patients analyzed had used at least 1 CAM approach. The most common modalities were herbal medicines (65.1%), dietary supplements (62.8%), vitamins (46.5%), and religion (34.9%). Only 11% of those interviewed had informed their doctor that they were using CAM. The most common reason for CAM usage was the desire to improve body resistance. Eighteen parents (50%) claimed that their children had benefited from CAM. Conclusion: Our findings reveal that there is a remarkably high tendency to use CAM in patients with CVID. Although no side effects were reported by the families, potential drug interactions should be considered. |
URI: | http://www.jiaci.org/issues/vol21issue6/7.pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11452/23912 |
ISSN: | 1018-9068 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.