Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/23936
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-07T13:09:16Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-07T13:09:16Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationNur, Z. vd. (2011). "Effect of freezing rate on acrosome and chromatin integrity in ram semen". Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 58(4), 267-272.tr_TR
dc.identifier.issn1300-0861-
dc.identifier.issn1308-2817-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1501/Vetfak_000000248-
dc.identifier.urihttp://vetjournal.ankara.edu.tr/tr/pub/issue/44729/555881-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/23936-
dc.description.abstractThe objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of different freezing rates on post-thaw sperm motility, acrosome defect, and sperm chromatin structure and apoptotic activity in ram semen. Collected semen was diluted at 1:5 (semen/extender) with Bioxel (R) (IMV technologies France) at 30 degrees C and then cooled to 5 degrees C within 1h. Cooled semen was subjected to the equilibration for 2 hours. Equilibrated semen was frozen in 0.25 ml straw at two different cooling rates (slow: 0.5 degrees C/min from 5 to -20 degrees C and fast: 5 degrees C/min from 5 to -20 degrees C). Both groups were frozen from -20 to -120 degrees C at 25 degrees C/min and stored in liquid nitrogen until use. Post-thaw (37 degrees C/30 min) sperm motility, defected acrosome (Pisum sativum agglutinin fluorescein conjugate, FITC PSA), sperm chromatin structure determined by Acridin Orange (AO) and apoptotic activity using terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) were evaluated. Post-thaw sperm motility, acrosome defect, AO and TUNEL for slow frozen semen were 42.8 +/- 8.8%, 31.6 +/- 12.9%, 2.9 +/- 2.4% and 2.8 +/- 1.6%, and for fast frozen semen were 36.5 +/- 9.9%, 24.7 +/- 11.1%, 3.3 +/- 2.2% and 6.3 +/- 3.4%, respectively. Post-thaw semen analyses showed that there was no significant difference between two freezing curves in terms of acrosome defect, sperm chromatin damage (AO). However, a significant difference was found for post-thaw semen motility between two groups (P<0.05). In conclusion, while the slow freezing procedure improved post-thaw sperm motility, acrosome and chromatin integrities and apoptotic index in ram spermatozoa did not show any significant difference between freezing rates.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAnkara Üniversitesitr_TR
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAtıf Gayri Ticari Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararasıtr_TR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectVeterinary sciencesen_US
dc.subjectApoptosisen_US
dc.subjectFreezing rateen_US
dc.subjectRam semenen_US
dc.subjectCryoprotective agentsen_US
dc.subjectMembrane integrityen_US
dc.subjectSpermatozoa frozenen_US
dc.subjectBull spermen_US
dc.subjectFertilityen_US
dc.subjectExtenderen_US
dc.subjectGlycerolen_US
dc.subjectCryopreservationen_US
dc.subjectInseminationen_US
dc.subjectOsmolalityen_US
dc.titleEffect of freezing rate on acrosome and chromatin integrity in ram semenen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000297776300008tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-80051498165tr_TR
dc.relation.tubitakTOVAG 105O649tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Veterinerlik Fakültesi/Üreme ve Suni Tohumlama Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Veterinerlik Fakültesi/Histoloji ve Embriyoloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1976-1814tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage267tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage272tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume58tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue4tr_TR
dc.relation.journalAnkara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisitr_TR
dc.contributor.buuauthorNur, Zekariya-
dc.contributor.buuauthorZık, Berrin-
dc.contributor.buuauthorÜstüner, Burcu-
dc.contributor.buuauthorTütüncü, Şerife-
dc.contributor.buuauthorSaǧirkaya, Hakan-
dc.contributor.buuauthorÖzgüden, Cansel G.-
dc.contributor.buuauthorGünay, Ülgen-
dc.contributor.buuauthorDoǧan, İbrahim-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-2635-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAG-7238-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-8821-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridR-8366-2018tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-9810-2021tr_TR
dc.indexed.trdizinTrDizintr_TR
dc.subject.wosVeterinary sciencesen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.wos.quartileQ4en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid6508060684tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6507763192tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid18937724600tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid16551094700tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6602400461tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid16550925100tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid55901087200tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid36762299000tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusArtificial Vagina; Semen; Semen Extendersen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
TrDizin
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Nur_vd_2011.pdf572.7 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons