Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25353
Title: | Thoracic paravertebral block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: Single injection versus multiple injections |
Authors: | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı. 0000-0002-3019-581X Kaya, Fatma Nur Türker, Gürkan Moğol, Elif Başağan Bayraktar, Selcan AAI-8213-2021 AAI-6642-2021 7003619647 7003400116 23982134100 34879358300 |
Keywords: | Anesthesiology Cardiovascular system & cardiology Respiratory system Paravertebral block Postoperative pain Analgesia Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery Nerve blockade Space Thoracotomy Anesthesia Spread |
Issue Date: | Feb-2012 |
Publisher: | W. B. Saunders - Elsevier |
Citation: | Kaya, F. N. vd. (2012). "Thoracic paravertebral block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: single injection versus multiple injections". Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 26(1), 90-94. |
Abstract: | Objective: Thoracic paravertebral blocks (PVBs) have been shown to be effective for analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with single- and multiple-injection techniques. The efficacy of single-injection PVB was compared with multiple-injection PVB on postoperative analgesia in VATS was studied. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: Single university hospital. Participants: Fifty patients undergoing VATS. Interventions: A nerve stimulator-guided PVB was performed in the sitting position before surgery using a solution of 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine by a single injection at T6 (group S, n = 25) or by 5 injections of 4 mL each at T4 to T8 (group M, n = 25). Measurements and Main Results: A successful PVB was achieved in all patients. The times to perform the blocks were 6.8 +/- 1.9 minutes in the S group and 17.9 +/- 3.0 minutes in the M group (p < 0.001). The times to block onset were 8.3 +/- 1.8 minutes in the S group and 7.2 +/- 0.9 minutes in the M group (p = 0.014). The numbers of anesthetized dermatomes were 5.8 +/- 0.8 for the S group and 6.6 +/- 1.1 for the M group (p = 0.009). The postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption with patient-controlled analgesia were comparable in the two groups. There were no significant differences in times to the first mobilization and hospital discharge for two groups. Patient satisfaction with the analgesic procedure was greater in the S group (p < 0.05). No complications were attributed to the blocks. Conclusions: The two techniques provided comparable postoperative analgesia. However, single-injection PVB may represent an advantage over multiple-injection PVB in patients undergoing VATS, with greater patient satisfaction associated with a shorter procedure and the likelihood of decreased complications. |
URI: | https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.008 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077011006549 http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25353 |
ISSN: | 1053-0770 1532-8422 |
Appears in Collections: | PubMed Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.