Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25353
Title: Thoracic paravertebral block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: Single injection versus multiple injections
Authors: Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0002-3019-581X
Kaya, Fatma Nur
Türker, Gürkan
Moğol, Elif Başağan
Bayraktar, Selcan
AAI-8213-2021
AAI-6642-2021
7003619647
7003400116
23982134100
34879358300
Keywords: Anesthesiology
Cardiovascular system & cardiology
Respiratory system
Paravertebral block
Postoperative pain
Analgesia
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery
Nerve blockade
Space
Thoracotomy
Anesthesia
Spread
Issue Date: Feb-2012
Publisher: W. B. Saunders - Elsevier
Citation: Kaya, F. N. vd. (2012). "Thoracic paravertebral block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: single injection versus multiple injections". Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, 26(1), 90-94.
Abstract: Objective: Thoracic paravertebral blocks (PVBs) have been shown to be effective for analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) with single- and multiple-injection techniques. The efficacy of single-injection PVB was compared with multiple-injection PVB on postoperative analgesia in VATS was studied. Design: Prospective, randomized study. Setting: Single university hospital. Participants: Fifty patients undergoing VATS. Interventions: A nerve stimulator-guided PVB was performed in the sitting position before surgery using a solution of 20 mL 0.5% bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine by a single injection at T6 (group S, n = 25) or by 5 injections of 4 mL each at T4 to T8 (group M, n = 25). Measurements and Main Results: A successful PVB was achieved in all patients. The times to perform the blocks were 6.8 +/- 1.9 minutes in the S group and 17.9 +/- 3.0 minutes in the M group (p < 0.001). The times to block onset were 8.3 +/- 1.8 minutes in the S group and 7.2 +/- 0.9 minutes in the M group (p = 0.014). The numbers of anesthetized dermatomes were 5.8 +/- 0.8 for the S group and 6.6 +/- 1.1 for the M group (p = 0.009). The postoperative pain scores and morphine consumption with patient-controlled analgesia were comparable in the two groups. There were no significant differences in times to the first mobilization and hospital discharge for two groups. Patient satisfaction with the analgesic procedure was greater in the S group (p < 0.05). No complications were attributed to the blocks. Conclusions: The two techniques provided comparable postoperative analgesia. However, single-injection PVB may represent an advantage over multiple-injection PVB in patients undergoing VATS, with greater patient satisfaction associated with a shorter procedure and the likelihood of decreased complications.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2011.09.008
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053077011006549
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/25353
ISSN: 1053-0770
1532-8422
Appears in Collections:PubMed
Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.