Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/26031
Title: | Economics of limiting congestion in urban forest recreation areas |
Authors: | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Tarım Ekonomisi Bölümü. Uludağ Üniversitesi/Ziraat Fakültesi/Peyzaj Mimarlığı Bölümü. 0000-0003-4673-7086 Gürlük, Serkan Atanur, Gül Turan, Özlem AAG-7236-2021 AAK-2856-2020 15750677500 51060899100 55257810300 |
Keywords: | Forestry Congestion pricing Survivor model Forest management Environmental valuation Recreation Urban forest Willingness-to-pay Contingent valuation National-park Benefits Demand Preferences Turkey Cities Economic analysis Mathematical models Prices Cost accounting Economics Environmental management Congestion level Contingent valuations Covariates Environmental quality Policy makers Model results Public goods Qualitative response Recreational sites Urban forests Welfare loss Willingness to pay Traffic congestion |
Issue Date: | 2012 |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
Citation: | Gürlük, S. vd. (2012). "Economics of limiting congestion in urban forest recreation areas". Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27(5), 449-459. |
Abstract: | This paper presents the results of a contingent valuation for evaluating environmental quality in the Ataturk Urban Forest of Bursa, Turkey. The environmental quality parameter under investigation at this recreational site is congestion. Congestion is an important externality having impacts on visitors' welfare at this site. Two distinct models were employed in this study. A qualitative response model was employed to find covariate effects depending on shifting congestion levels. The other model used was the survivor model. The survivor model brings new insights to congestion pricing literature to find the mean willingness to pay for shifting congestion levels changing from level-I to level-V. It is a useful method for congestion pricing when covariate impacts are not important for the analyst. According to the survivor model results, respondents evaluated congestion level-I, which is the lowest congestion level, with an amount of USD 32.08 per visit. The value of congestion level-V, which is highest congestion level, was USD 4.34 per visit. If these amounts are aggregated into total visit rates, they correspond to USD 2,245,600 and USD 303,800 for congestion levels-I and V, respectively. Differences between these values are welfare losses of this public good. The outcomes of this paper may help policy-makers resolve environmental management issues. |
URI: | https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2012.657670 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02827581.2012.657670 http://hdl.handle.net/11452/26031 |
ISSN: | 0282-7581 |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.