Bu öğeden alıntı yapmak, öğeye bağlanmak için bu tanımlayıcıyı kullanınız:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/26297
Başlık: | Effects of presynchronization with gonadotropin-releasing hormone-prostaglandin F-2 alpha or progesterone before Ovsynch in noncyclic dairy cows |
Yazarlar: | Alkan, Ali Okut, Hayrettin Uludağ Üniversitesi/Veteriner Fakültesi/Jinekoloji ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı. 0000-0003-2817-3221 Yılmazbaş, Gülnaz Mecitoğlu Karakaya, Ebru Keskin, Abdülkadir Gümen, Ahmet AAH-3831-2021 AAG-4440-2019 AAH-1406-2021 36457964000 36457784500 24473229800 6602393069 |
Anahtar kelimeler: | Agriculture Food science & technology Noncyclic cow Ovsynch Presynchronization Progesterone Timed artificial-insemination Pregnancy rates Holstein cows Ovulation Synchronization Protocol Gnrh Follicle Cattle Insert Bos |
Yayın Tarihi: | Ara-2012 |
Yayıncı: | Elsevier Science |
Atıf: | Yılmazbaş, M. G. vd. (2012). "Effects of presynchronization with gonadotropin-releasing hormone-prostaglandin F-2 alpha or progesterone before Ovsynch in noncyclic dairy cows". Journal of Dairy Science, 95(12), 7186-7194. |
Özet: | The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of presynchronization with GnRH and PGF(2 alpha) or with progesterone on overall Ovsynch (OVS) outcomes in noncyclic dairy cows. Cows were scanned 7 d apart with ultrasonography to determine cyclicity. Noncyclic cows (n = 281; no corpus luteum on ovaries at both examinations) were randomly divided into 3 groups. In the GP group (n = 108), the cows received GnRH and PGF(2 alpha) (PGF) administrations 7 d apart, and OVS was started 11 d after PGF (GnRH-7 d-PGF-11 d-OVS). In the P4 group (n = 90), the cows were treated for 7 d with an intravaginal progesterone (P4) implant (PRID), and then OVS was started 11 d after removal of the implant (7 d PRID-11 d-OVS). The control group (CON, n = 83) did not receive any presynchronization, and OVS was started at the same time as in the other groups (18 d-OVS). The percentage of cows that became cyclic at the beginning of OVS was lower in the CON group (38.6%; 32/83) than in the presynchronization groups (66.7%, 72/108 in GP; 71.1%, 64/90 in P4). The response to the first GnRH of OVS did not differ among groups (63.9%, 53/83 in CON; 67.6%, 73/108 in GP; 63.3%; 57/90 in P4), and synchronization rates were similar among the groups (74-82%). The cows that responded to presynchronization treatments (GP or P4) had higher pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) than did nonresponding cows. Pregnancy per AI at 31 d did not differ between groups (30.1%, 25/83 in CON; 43.5%, 47/108 in GP; and 35.6%, 32/90 in P4). However, CON cows (24.1%, 20/83) had lower P/AI at 62 d than GP cows (41.7%, 45/108). Embryonic loss was higher in CON (20%, 5/25) compared with the P4 group (3%, 1/32). The administration of GnRH followed by PGF or exogenous progesterone (PRID) similarly increased the percentage of cows that became cyclic before Ovsynch in noncyclic cows, but fertility did not improve. However, the cows that responded to presynchronization had higher fertility rates than the nonresponding cows. |
URI: | https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5920 https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030212007163 http://hdl.handle.net/11452/26297 |
ISSN: | 0022-0302 1525-3198 |
Koleksiyonlarda Görünür: | Scopus Web of Science |
Bu öğenin dosyaları:
Dosya | Açıklama | Boyut | Biçim | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Yılmazbaş_vd_2012.pdf | 348.14 kB | Adobe PDF | Göster/Aç |
Bu öğe kapsamında lisanslı Creative Commons License