Bu öğeden alıntı yapmak, öğeye bağlanmak için bu tanımlayıcıyı kullanınız: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/29582
Başlık: Social media awareness among non-urogynecologists regarding the current mesh discussions in urogynecology: A survey study
Yazarlar: Rantell, Angie
Cardozo, Linda
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Kliniği/Ürojinekoloji ve Pelvik Rekonstrüktif Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı.
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Biyoistatistik Bölümü.
0000-0002-9277-7735
0000-0002-7558-8166
Orhan, Adnan
Özerkan, Kemal
Kasapoğlu, Işıl
Ocakoğlu, Gökhan
Aslan, Münir Kiper
Mert, Sevde Nur
Uncu, Gökhan
AAT-3479-2021
AER-7173-2022
AAH-9791-2021
AAH-9694-2021
AAH-5180-2021
V-5292-2019
56671094200
6603345841
55800494800
15832295800
56740498500
57215021844
6603716169
Anahtar kelimeler: Mesh complications
Mesh discussion
Practical survey study
Pelvic organ prolapse
Urinary-incontinence
Women
Obstetrics & gynecology
Urology & nephrology
Yayın Tarihi: 23-Oca-2020
Yayıncı: Springer
Atıf: Orhan, A. vd. (2020). "Social media awareness among non-urogynecologists regarding the current mesh discussions in urogynecology: A survey study". International Urogynecology Journal, 31(6), 1231-1243.
Özet: Introduction and hypothesis There has been a great deal of discussion about mesh complications in urogynecology in recent years. However, awareness of other doctors who are not urogynecologists is unknown. This study was aimed at determining the level of awareness of mesh discussions among medical doctors whose specialty is not urology or gynecology. Methods A survey study was administered, and all medical doctors, except gynecologists and urologists, were invited. Respondent doctors were classified into four groups: King's College Hospital (KCH), UK; Uludag University Hospital (UUH), Turkey; the United States (USA); and the world (WORLD). The primary outcome was the awareness of mesh discussion in urogynecology, and the secondary outcome was the social media awareness of the mesh discussion. Results 1231 doctors responded to the survey. The awareness of the current mesh problems among the respondent doctors was 15.8% in KCH, 15.4% in UUH, 26.9% in the USA, and 16.2% in WORLD. The social media awareness about mesh problems was 20.8% in KCH, 20.3% in UUH, 32.8% in the USA, and 20.6% in WORLD. Although there were no differences among three of the groups with regard to primary and secondary outcomes, the USA group score was statistically significantly higher than the others. Conclusions Social media can influence doctors' thinking on controversial academic issues. In this survey study, non-urogynecologist doctors in the USA cohort have higher awareness levels and a higher social media awareness level than other groups.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-020-04242-3
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00192-020-04242-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/29582
ISSN: 0937-3462
Koleksiyonlarda Görünür:Scopus
Web of Science

Bu öğenin dosyaları:
Bu öğeyle ilişkili dosya bulunmamaktadır.


DSpace'deki bütün öğeler, aksi belirtilmedikçe, tüm hakları saklı tutulmak şartıyla telif hakkı ile korunmaktadır.