Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/30166
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeğenen, Maruf-
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-29T10:54:57Z-
dc.date.available2022-12-29T10:54:57Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-29-
dc.identifier.citationBeğenen, M. vd. (2020). "Evaluation of prognostic value of MEDS, MEWS, and CURB-65 criteria and sepsis I and sepsis III criteria in patients with community-acquired infection in emergency department". Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 27(5), 277-285.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1024-9079-
dc.identifier.issn2309-5407-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1024907919844866-
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024907919844866-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/30166-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Early and effective treatment of patients with sepsis requires early recognition in emergency department and understanding the severity of the disease. Many studies have been conducted for this purpose, and many of scoring systems have been developed that provide early recognition of these patients and show their severity. Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the scoring systems used to determine the mortality of patients with infections admitted in emergency department. Methods: In all, 400 patients who admitted to Uludag University Hospital Emergency Department were prospectively included in this study. In addition to Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome score, Quick SOFA score, Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score, Modified Early Warning Score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score in all patients, CURB-65 score was calculated in the patients diagnosed with pneumonia. It has been aimed to determine the power of these scores' predictive mortality rates and their superiority to each other. Results: It was found that Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score and Quick SOFA score could be used with similar efficacy (respectively p = 0.761 and p = 0.073) in determining early mortality in emergency department (5th and 14th days) and that MEDS score was more effective (p < 0.001) in predicting the 28th-day mortality. While these recommendations were valid in patients diagnosed with pneumonia, it was determined that CURB-65 score could also be used to estimate 5th-, 14th-, and 28th-day mortalities (respectively, for the 5th day, p = 0.894 and p = 0.256; for the 14th day, p = 0.425 and p = 0.098; and for the 28th day, p = 0.095 and p = 0.158). The power of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome score, previously used to identify sepsis, in predicting mortality was detected to be lower. Conclusion: Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score and Quick SOFA score could be used with similar efficacy in determining early mortality in emergency department. However, if you want to predict 28th-day mortality rate, it can be better to use Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score or CURB-65 (in patients diagnosed with pneumonia).en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSage Publicationsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAtıf Gayri Ticari Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararasıtr_TR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEmergency departmenten_US
dc.subjectSepsisen_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectOrgan failure assessmenten_US
dc.subjectUnited-Statesen_US
dc.subjectSeptic shocken_US
dc.subjectMortalityen_US
dc.subjectCareen_US
dc.subjectDefinitionsen_US
dc.subjectPerformanceen_US
dc.subjectPredictionen_US
dc.subjectPneumoniaen_US
dc.subjectTrendsen_US
dc.subjectEmergency medicineen_US
dc.titleEvaluation of prognostic value of MEDS, MEWS, and CURB-65 criteria and sepsis I and sepsis III criteria in patients with community-acquired infection in emergency departmenten_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000559534200004tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85065173108tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Acil Tıp Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentBursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0836-7862tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7530-1279tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4641-9873tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage277tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage285tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume27tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue5tr_TR
dc.relation.journalHong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorDurak, Vahide Aslıhan-
dc.contributor.buuauthorAkalın, Emin Halis-
dc.contributor.buuauthorArmağan, Erol-
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-8846-2021tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAU-8952-2020tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAE-9483-2021tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationSanayitr_TR
dc.subject.wosEmergency medicineen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.wos.quartileQ4en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid55792633100tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid57207553671tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6506464232tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusIntensive Care Unit; Sepsis (Diptera); Septic Shocken_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeAgeden_US
dc.subject.emtreeArticleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeBreathing rateen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCharlson comorbidity indexen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCommunity acquired infectionen_US
dc.subject.emtreeControlled studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeCURB-65 scoreen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDiagnostic test accuracy studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeEmergency warden_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHospital mortalityen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHeart rateen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHospitalizationen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLength of stayen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMajor clinical studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeModified early warning scoreen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMortality in emergency department sepsis scoreen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMortality rateen_US
dc.subject.emtreeNeutrophil lymphocyte ratioen_US
dc.subject.emtreePredictive valueen_US
dc.subject.emtreePrognostic assessmenten_US
dc.subject.emtreeReceiver operating characteristicen_US
dc.subject.emtreeScoring systemen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSensitivity and specificityen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSepsisen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSequential organ failure assessment scoreen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSystolic blood pressureen_US
dc.subject.emtreeUrea nitrogen blood levelen_US
dc.subject.emtreeUrinalysisen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Durak_vd_2020.pdf348.12 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons