Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/30166
Title: Evaluation of prognostic value of MEDS, MEWS, and CURB-65 criteria and sepsis I and sepsis III criteria in patients with community-acquired infection in emergency department
Authors: Beğenen, Maruf
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Acil Tıp Anabilim Dalı.
Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları ve Klinik Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı.
0000-0003-0836-7862
0000-0001-7530-1279
0000-0002-4641-9873
Durak, Vahide Aslıhan
Akalın, Emin Halis
Armağan, Erol
AAH-8846-2021
AAU-8952-2020
AAE-9483-2021
55792633100
57207553671
6506464232
Keywords: Emergency department
Sepsis
Mortality
Organ failure assessment
United-States
Septic shock
Mortality
Care
Definitions
Performance
Prediction
Pneumonia
Trends
Emergency medicine
Issue Date: 29-Apr-2019
Publisher: Sage Publications
Citation: Beğenen, M. vd. (2020). "Evaluation of prognostic value of MEDS, MEWS, and CURB-65 criteria and sepsis I and sepsis III criteria in patients with community-acquired infection in emergency department". Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine, 27(5), 277-285.
Abstract: Background: Early and effective treatment of patients with sepsis requires early recognition in emergency department and understanding the severity of the disease. Many studies have been conducted for this purpose, and many of scoring systems have been developed that provide early recognition of these patients and show their severity. Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the scoring systems used to determine the mortality of patients with infections admitted in emergency department. Methods: In all, 400 patients who admitted to Uludag University Hospital Emergency Department were prospectively included in this study. In addition to Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome score, Quick SOFA score, Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score, Modified Early Warning Score, and Charlson Comorbidity Index score in all patients, CURB-65 score was calculated in the patients diagnosed with pneumonia. It has been aimed to determine the power of these scores' predictive mortality rates and their superiority to each other. Results: It was found that Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score and Quick SOFA score could be used with similar efficacy (respectively p = 0.761 and p = 0.073) in determining early mortality in emergency department (5th and 14th days) and that MEDS score was more effective (p < 0.001) in predicting the 28th-day mortality. While these recommendations were valid in patients diagnosed with pneumonia, it was determined that CURB-65 score could also be used to estimate 5th-, 14th-, and 28th-day mortalities (respectively, for the 5th day, p = 0.894 and p = 0.256; for the 14th day, p = 0.425 and p = 0.098; and for the 28th day, p = 0.095 and p = 0.158). The power of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome score, previously used to identify sepsis, in predicting mortality was detected to be lower. Conclusion: Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score and Quick SOFA score could be used with similar efficacy in determining early mortality in emergency department. However, if you want to predict 28th-day mortality rate, it can be better to use Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis score or CURB-65 (in patients diagnosed with pneumonia).
URI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024907919844866
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024907919844866
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/30166
ISSN: 1024-9079
2309-5407
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Durak_vd_2020.pdf348.12 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons