Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/30619
Title: Complications of primary placement of motility post in porous polyethylene implants during enucleation
Authors: Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Oftalmoloji Bölümü.
0000-0003-0995-5260
0000-0001-8889-1933
Yazıcı, Bülent
Akova, Berna
Şanlı, Özgür
ABE-3033-2020
AAA-5384-2020
7005398015
55370489800
7004734943
Keywords: Ophthalmology
Peg placement
Hydroxyapatite orbital implant
Coralline hydroxyapatite
Anophthalmic socket
Coupling post
Experience
Evisceration
Exposure
Prevention
Sleeve
Issue Date: 26-Jan-2007
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Citation: Yazıcı, B. vd. (2007). "Complications of primary placement of motility post in porous polyethylene implants during enucleation". American Journal of Ophthalmology, 143(5), 828-834.
Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the complications associated with the primary placement of a motility coupling post (MCP) in spherical porous polyethylene (PP) implants at the time of enucleation. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: The records of all patients who had undergone primary enucleation and spherical PP implant with MCP insertion, and who were followed for at least six months were reviewed. The MCP was screwed to a wrapped implant to protrude 3 mm to 4 mm anteriorly. After placing the implant into the orbit, the extraocular muscles were sutured to the implant, and the Tenon capsule and conjunctiva were closed onto the MCP. When the MCP was not exposed spontaneously within two months after surgery, it was externalized with a conjunctival cut-down procedure. RESULTS: The study included 52 patients (29 male, 23 female; age range, three to 76 years). The MCP became exposed spontaneously in 10 patients (19%). In the early postoperative period, we recorded nine complications in seven patients (13%), which might be related to primary MCP placement. These included prominent MCP decentration associated with implant motility restriction (6%), preseptal cellulitis (4%), and conjunctival prolapsus (8%). An ocular prosthesis was fit successfully onto the MCP in 51 patients. During the late period, 22 complications occurred in 15 patients (29%), including excessive discharge (15%), MCP decentration (4%), implant exposure (6%), implant infection (2%), pyogenic granuloma (8%), conjunctival overgrowth over the MCP (2%), conjunctival discoloration (4%), and lax eyelid syndrome (2%). Mean follow-up time was 34 months (range, six to 68 months). CONCLUSIONS: Although MCP placement in the spherical PP implant during enucleation is a useful technique, it may be associated with complications such as MCP decentration, excessive discharge, exposure, and infection of the implant.
URI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2007.01.049
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002939407001201
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/30619
ISSN: 00029394
Appears in Collections:PubMed
Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.