Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31071
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorÇelen, Sinan-
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T07:55:57Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-21T07:55:57Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-24-
dc.identifier.citationKaygısız, O. vd. (2017). ''Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy''. International Braz J Urol, 43(5), 863-870.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1677-5538-
dc.identifier.issn1677-6119-
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0550-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scielo.br/j/ibju/a/Pg73qbP9DfQjNwrYqp6xJ6B/?lang=en-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11452/31071-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To comparatively evaluate the traditional interrupted knot-tying and running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl (R) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 62 consecutive patients undergoing LPN using traditional interrupted knot-tying suture renorrhaphy (Group 1; n= 31) or running suture technique renorrhaphy with 2-0 monofilament polyglecaprone (Monocryl (R), Ethicon) (Group 2; n= 31) from December 2011 to October 2015 at the University. All patients underwent LPN performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The demographic, perioperative and postoperative parameters were compared between the groups, and the effect of both suture techniques on the warm ischemic time (WIT) and trifecta were evaluated. Results: The running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl (R) reduced WIT, estimated blood lost and length of hospitalization stay significantly without increasing postoperative complication rate during LPN in comparison with interrupted knot-tying suture. Conclusion: The renorrhaphy using the running suture with Monocryl (R) is an effective and safe technique with the advantage of shortening WIT even in more challenging and larger tumors during LPN.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBrazilian Social Urologyen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rightsAtıf Gayri Ticari Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararasıtr_TR
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectUrology & nephrologyen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subjectNephrectomyen_US
dc.subjectSuture techniquesen_US
dc.subjectInvasive partial nephrectomyen_US
dc.subjectRetaining barbed sutureen_US
dc.subjectWarm ischemia timeen_US
dc.subjectRenal tumorsen_US
dc.subjectOutcomesen_US
dc.subjectRenorrhaphyen_US
dc.subjectExperienceen_US
dc.subjectKidneyen_US
dc.subject.meshAdulten_US
dc.subject.meshAgeden_US
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and overen_US
dc.subject.meshDioxanesen_US
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_US
dc.subject.meshHumansen_US
dc.subject.meshKidney neoplasmsen_US
dc.subject.meshLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subject.meshMaleen_US
dc.subject.meshMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.meshNephrectomyen_US
dc.subject.meshPolyestersen_US
dc.subject.meshRetrospective studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshSuture techniquesen_US
dc.titleComparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.wos000417397100010tr_TR
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85033368677tr_TR
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergitr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Üroloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.departmentUludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Cerrahi Patoloji Anabilim Dalı.tr_TR
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9790-7295tr_TR
dc.identifier.startpage863tr_TR
dc.identifier.endpage870tr_TR
dc.identifier.volume43tr_TR
dc.identifier.issue5tr_TR
dc.relation.journalInternational Braz J Urolen_US
dc.contributor.buuauthorKaygısız, Onur-
dc.contributor.buuauthorVuruşkan, Berna Aytaç-
dc.contributor.buuauthorVuruşkan, Hakan-
dc.contributor.researcheridL-9439-2019tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAM-9726-2020tr_TR
dc.contributor.researcheridAAH-9746-2021tr_TR
dc.relation.collaborationSanayitr_TR
dc.identifier.pubmed28727369tr_TR
dc.subject.wosUrology & nephrologyen_US
dc.indexed.wosSCIEen_US
dc.indexed.scopusScopusen_US
dc.indexed.pubmedPubMeden_US
dc.wos.quartileQ4en_US
dc.contributor.scopusid16637252400tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid56527372000tr_TR
dc.contributor.scopusid6507328150tr_TR
dc.subject.scopusNephrectomy; Kidney Tumor; Surgical Marginen_US
dc.subject.emtreeDioxane derivativeen_US
dc.subject.emtreeGlycolide E-caprolactone copolymeren_US
dc.subject.emtreePolyesteren_US
dc.subject.emtreeAdulten_US
dc.subject.emtreeAgeden_US
dc.subject.emtreeComparative studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeFemaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeHumanen_US
dc.subject.emtreeKidney neoplasmsen_US
dc.subject.emtreeLaparoscopyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMaleen_US
dc.subject.emtreeMiddle ageden_US
dc.subject.emtreeNephrectomyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeProceduresen_US
dc.subject.emtreeRetrospective studyen_US
dc.subject.emtreeSuture techniqueen_US
dc.subject.emtreeVery elderlyen_US
Appears in Collections:Scopus
Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kaygısız_vd_201.pdf154.26 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons