Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31071
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Çelen, Sinan | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-21T07:55:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-21T07:55:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-01-24 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Kaygısız, O. vd. (2017). ''Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy''. International Braz J Urol, 43(5), 863-870. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1677-5538 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1677-6119 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0550 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.scielo.br/j/ibju/a/Pg73qbP9DfQjNwrYqp6xJ6B/?lang=en | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11452/31071 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective: To comparatively evaluate the traditional interrupted knot-tying and running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl (R) in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 62 consecutive patients undergoing LPN using traditional interrupted knot-tying suture renorrhaphy (Group 1; n= 31) or running suture technique renorrhaphy with 2-0 monofilament polyglecaprone (Monocryl (R), Ethicon) (Group 2; n= 31) from December 2011 to October 2015 at the University. All patients underwent LPN performed by an experienced laparoscopic surgeon. The demographic, perioperative and postoperative parameters were compared between the groups, and the effect of both suture techniques on the warm ischemic time (WIT) and trifecta were evaluated. Results: The running suture renorrhaphy with Monocryl (R) reduced WIT, estimated blood lost and length of hospitalization stay significantly without increasing postoperative complication rate during LPN in comparison with interrupted knot-tying suture. Conclusion: The renorrhaphy using the running suture with Monocryl (R) is an effective and safe technique with the advantage of shortening WIT even in more challenging and larger tumors during LPN. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Brazilian Social Urology | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.rights | Atıf Gayri Ticari Türetilemez 4.0 Uluslararası | tr_TR |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Urology & nephrology | en_US |
dc.subject | Laparoscopy | en_US |
dc.subject | Nephrectomy | en_US |
dc.subject | Suture techniques | en_US |
dc.subject | Invasive partial nephrectomy | en_US |
dc.subject | Retaining barbed suture | en_US |
dc.subject | Warm ischemia time | en_US |
dc.subject | Renal tumors | en_US |
dc.subject | Outcomes | en_US |
dc.subject | Renorrhaphy | en_US |
dc.subject | Experience | en_US |
dc.subject | Kidney | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 and over | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Dioxanes | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Kidney neoplasms | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Laparoscopy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle aged | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Nephrectomy | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Polyesters | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Retrospective studies | en_US |
dc.subject.mesh | Suture techniques | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of two different suture techniques in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | 000417397100010 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85033368677 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Üroloji Anabilim Dalı. | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.department | Uludağ Üniversitesi/Tıp Fakültesi/Cerrahi Patoloji Anabilim Dalı. | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-9790-7295 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.startpage | 863 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.endpage | 870 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.volume | 43 | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.journal | International Braz J Urol | en_US |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Kaygısız, Onur | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Vuruşkan, Berna Aytaç | - |
dc.contributor.buuauthor | Vuruşkan, Hakan | - |
dc.contributor.researcherid | L-9439-2019 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAM-9726-2020 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.researcherid | AAH-9746-2021 | tr_TR |
dc.relation.collaboration | Sanayi | tr_TR |
dc.identifier.pubmed | 28727369 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.wos | Urology & nephrology | en_US |
dc.indexed.wos | SCIE | en_US |
dc.indexed.scopus | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indexed.pubmed | PubMed | en_US |
dc.wos.quartile | Q4 | en_US |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 16637252400 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 56527372000 | tr_TR |
dc.contributor.scopusid | 6507328150 | tr_TR |
dc.subject.scopus | Nephrectomy; Kidney Tumor; Surgical Margin | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Dioxane derivative | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Glycolide E-caprolactone copolymer | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Polyester | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Adult | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Aged | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Comparative study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Female | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Human | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Kidney neoplasms | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Laparoscopy | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Male | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Middle aged | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Nephrectomy | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Procedures | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Retrospective study | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Suture technique | en_US |
dc.subject.emtree | Very elderly | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Scopus Web of Science |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kaygısız_vd_201.pdf | 154.26 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License